We have located links that may give you full text access.
Predictors of one year pressure injury outcomes in hospitalized spinal cord injured veterans with one stage 3 or 4 pressure injury.
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 2023 Februrary 7
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate predictors of pressure injury (PrI) outcomes at one year after discharge for Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) hospitalized with a Stage 3 or 4 PrI.
DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective medical record review from one VA Health Care System SCI unit. Participants were Veterans with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI admitted with one Stage 3 or 4 pelvic PrI treated medically (e.g. without flap surgery). Logistic models were used to select the significant predictors of PrI healing outcomes.
OUTCOME MEASURE: One year after discharge wound outcomes (healed vs non-healed) for Veterans with SCI hospitalized with a Stage 3 or 4 PrI.
RESULTS: A total of 62 hospitalizations were included for analyses resulting in 33 healed and 29 non-healed PrIs. Three significant predictors of non-healed PrI outcomes included use of pressure mapping during hospitalization, greater PrI depth, and usage of alginate dressings. Two significant predictors of healed PrI outcomes included the use of animal-based tissue and hydrocolloid dressings. Area under curve of this logistic regression model was 79.98%.
CONCLUSION: The clinical decision of having a patient pressure mapped predicts that the PrI may not heal at one year of discharge. Pressure mapping protocol correlated with another variable that could not serve as a predictor by itself, including using powered pressure relief techniques. The three PrI treatment predictors may represent characteristics of the PrI itself, rather than the efficacy of the product. Further investigation on these clinical decision-making factors is warranted to ensure efficient and cost-effective treatment strategies for individuals with SCI hospitalized with PrIs.
DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective medical record review from one VA Health Care System SCI unit. Participants were Veterans with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI admitted with one Stage 3 or 4 pelvic PrI treated medically (e.g. without flap surgery). Logistic models were used to select the significant predictors of PrI healing outcomes.
OUTCOME MEASURE: One year after discharge wound outcomes (healed vs non-healed) for Veterans with SCI hospitalized with a Stage 3 or 4 PrI.
RESULTS: A total of 62 hospitalizations were included for analyses resulting in 33 healed and 29 non-healed PrIs. Three significant predictors of non-healed PrI outcomes included use of pressure mapping during hospitalization, greater PrI depth, and usage of alginate dressings. Two significant predictors of healed PrI outcomes included the use of animal-based tissue and hydrocolloid dressings. Area under curve of this logistic regression model was 79.98%.
CONCLUSION: The clinical decision of having a patient pressure mapped predicts that the PrI may not heal at one year of discharge. Pressure mapping protocol correlated with another variable that could not serve as a predictor by itself, including using powered pressure relief techniques. The three PrI treatment predictors may represent characteristics of the PrI itself, rather than the efficacy of the product. Further investigation on these clinical decision-making factors is warranted to ensure efficient and cost-effective treatment strategies for individuals with SCI hospitalized with PrIs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app