We have located links that may give you full text access.
Social determinants of pacemaker reuse among patients and family members in Pakistan.
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 2023 Februrary 7
OBJECTIVES: This survey aimed to quantify the opinions of CIED reuse among patients and family members in Pakistan and to identify the social determinants which may predict these views.
METHODS: A questionnaire formulating attitudes toward PPM reuse was administered to patients and family members at cardiology institutes in Pakistan from 1st July 2022 to 30th September 2022. The eligibility criteria (age > 18 years; inline for PPM placement) were taken into account and incomplete responses were excluded from the final analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 9,246 participants recorded their responses, of which 7,152 (78.16%) accepted pre-used PPMs. The lower social class had more PPM reuse acceptance rate than the middle and upper class (92.72% vs. 60.52% vs. 35.38%), respectively. Age ≥ 65 (OR(95%CI): 0.68 (0.41 - 0.99); P-value = 0.023), male gender (OR(95%CI): 0.55 (0.35 - 0.72), P-value = 0.016), unemployment (OR(95%CI): 0.47 (0.25 - 0.64); P-value = 0.007), poor health status (OR(95%CI): 0.72 (0.53 - 0.92); P-value = 0.041), and lower social class (OR(95%CI): 0.36 (0.28 - 0.53); P-value = 0.003) were social determinants of PPM reuse acceptance.
CONCLUSION: Patients and their family members endorse the concept of PPM reuse in Pakistan who cannot afford new devices.
METHODS: A questionnaire formulating attitudes toward PPM reuse was administered to patients and family members at cardiology institutes in Pakistan from 1st July 2022 to 30th September 2022. The eligibility criteria (age > 18 years; inline for PPM placement) were taken into account and incomplete responses were excluded from the final analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 9,246 participants recorded their responses, of which 7,152 (78.16%) accepted pre-used PPMs. The lower social class had more PPM reuse acceptance rate than the middle and upper class (92.72% vs. 60.52% vs. 35.38%), respectively. Age ≥ 65 (OR(95%CI): 0.68 (0.41 - 0.99); P-value = 0.023), male gender (OR(95%CI): 0.55 (0.35 - 0.72), P-value = 0.016), unemployment (OR(95%CI): 0.47 (0.25 - 0.64); P-value = 0.007), poor health status (OR(95%CI): 0.72 (0.53 - 0.92); P-value = 0.041), and lower social class (OR(95%CI): 0.36 (0.28 - 0.53); P-value = 0.003) were social determinants of PPM reuse acceptance.
CONCLUSION: Patients and their family members endorse the concept of PPM reuse in Pakistan who cannot afford new devices.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app