We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Prognosis of Patients With Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Population-based Study From SEER Database.
Clinical Breast Cancer 2023 April
BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) was a particularly aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis. This retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical features, prognostic factors, and benefits of surgery of patients with TNBC.
METHODS: From 2010 to 2015, 33654 female patients with TNBC were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The patients were randomly divided into the training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariable cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors, based on which a nomogram was constructed. Validation of the nomogram was assessed by concordance index (c-index) and calibration curves. Survival curves were plotted according to metastatic burdens and risk groups differentiated by nomogram.
RESULTS: Patients of younger age (<65 years old), white race, married status, lower grade, lower TNM stage and primary tumor surgery tended to have better outcome. The C-index and calibration curves displayed high discrimination in the training and validation sets (C-index 0.794 and 0.793, respectively), indicating suitable external performance of the nomogram model. Patients of bone-only metastases as well as bone and liver metastases showed superior cancer-specific survival (CSS) time if surgery of primary tumor was performed. Besides, patients of all risk groups showed better CSS when receiving surgery.
CONCLUSION: This study provided population-based prognostic analysis in patients with TNBC and constructed a predicting nomogram with a robust discrimination. The findings of potential benefit of surgery to CSS would shed some lights on the treatment tactics of patients with TNBC.
METHODS: From 2010 to 2015, 33654 female patients with TNBC were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The patients were randomly divided into the training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariable cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors, based on which a nomogram was constructed. Validation of the nomogram was assessed by concordance index (c-index) and calibration curves. Survival curves were plotted according to metastatic burdens and risk groups differentiated by nomogram.
RESULTS: Patients of younger age (<65 years old), white race, married status, lower grade, lower TNM stage and primary tumor surgery tended to have better outcome. The C-index and calibration curves displayed high discrimination in the training and validation sets (C-index 0.794 and 0.793, respectively), indicating suitable external performance of the nomogram model. Patients of bone-only metastases as well as bone and liver metastases showed superior cancer-specific survival (CSS) time if surgery of primary tumor was performed. Besides, patients of all risk groups showed better CSS when receiving surgery.
CONCLUSION: This study provided population-based prognostic analysis in patients with TNBC and constructed a predicting nomogram with a robust discrimination. The findings of potential benefit of surgery to CSS would shed some lights on the treatment tactics of patients with TNBC.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app