Sensory retraining for Central Post-Stroke Pain: A subgroup analysis within a randomized controlled trial.
NeuroRehabilitation 2023 January 10
BACKGROUND: Explicit Sensory Retraining (SR) has been suggested for pain management in several neuropathic pain syndromes.
OBJECTIVES: To study the effectiveness of SR on Central Post Stroke Pain (CPSP) symptoms.
METHODS: A preplanned subgroup of 23 subjects post-stroke reporting central pain were randomized within a larger study, to receive either explicit sensory discrimination retraining (SR) (in subgroup n = 11) or implicit repeated exposure to stimuli (RE) (in subgroup n = 12), applied to the lower limb. Pain intensity measured by VAS, measures of sensory ability; balance and gait activities; and participation were assessed by a blinded assessor at four points in time.
RESULTS: A group*time interaction effect was demonstrated (p = 0.04) for VAS, as for the SR treatment group VAS decreased from 56/100 to 23/100. Nine out of eleven subjects in the SR group demonstrated positive response to treatment. Pain alleviation was maintained at follow-up. A similar interaction effect was found for tactile threshold (p = 0.03). Significant improvement was noted for all other variables with no group differences.
CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence to the clinically relevant positive effect of explicit sensory retraining for subjects with CPSP. The positive effect on tactile threshold detection could potentially indicate pain alleviation mechanisms.
OBJECTIVES: To study the effectiveness of SR on Central Post Stroke Pain (CPSP) symptoms.
METHODS: A preplanned subgroup of 23 subjects post-stroke reporting central pain were randomized within a larger study, to receive either explicit sensory discrimination retraining (SR) (in subgroup n = 11) or implicit repeated exposure to stimuli (RE) (in subgroup n = 12), applied to the lower limb. Pain intensity measured by VAS, measures of sensory ability; balance and gait activities; and participation were assessed by a blinded assessor at four points in time.
RESULTS: A group*time interaction effect was demonstrated (p = 0.04) for VAS, as for the SR treatment group VAS decreased from 56/100 to 23/100. Nine out of eleven subjects in the SR group demonstrated positive response to treatment. Pain alleviation was maintained at follow-up. A similar interaction effect was found for tactile threshold (p = 0.03). Significant improvement was noted for all other variables with no group differences.
CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence to the clinically relevant positive effect of explicit sensory retraining for subjects with CPSP. The positive effect on tactile threshold detection could potentially indicate pain alleviation mechanisms.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Carvedilol, probably the β-blocker of choice for everyone with cirrhosis and portal hypertension: But not so fast!Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2023 June
The five types of glomerulonephritis classified by pathogenesis, activity, and chronicity (GN-AC).Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2023 May 23
Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuresis: From Pathophysiology to Management.Endocrine Reviews 2023 March 29
American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.Gastroenterology 2023 June
The future of intensive care: the study of the microcirculation will help to guide our therapies.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2023 May 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app