We have located links that may give you full text access.
Two-dimensional speckle tracking-derived global longitudinal strain in healthy Doberman Pinschers: method evaluation, variability, and reference values.
Journal of Veterinary Cardiology : the Official Journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology 2022 December 7
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of two-dimensional speckle tracking (2D-ST)-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) in healthy Doberman Pinschers (DP) is essential before it can be used in diseased DP to assess systolic function. To determine feasibility and observer related measurement variability of 2D-ST-derived GLS by use of AutoSTRAIN (AUTO) and 2D Cardiac Performance Analysis (TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH, Unterschleissheim, Germany).
ANIMALS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: This prospective study included 120 healthy, client-owned DP presented for screening evaluation. Global longitudinal strain of the apical four- (GLSA4C ), two-, and three-chamber view as well as the average GLS of all three views combined (GLSAV ) were determined, compared, and reference values established. Measurement variability was assessed by using intra- and inter-observer coefficient of variation.
RESULTS: A small difference existed for GLSAV (mean + 0.23%; P=0.022) between the two software programs although the determined strain values were similar and positively correlated (r = 0.84; P<0.001). No difference could be found between GLSAV and GLSA4C for AUTO (mean + 0.16%; P=0.228), whereas a difference existed for Cardiac Performance Analysis (mean -0.89% (end-systolic strain) and -0.56% (peak strain), P<0.0001). Software specific reference values were established for GLSAV and GLSA4C . Intra- and inter-observer coefficient of variation revealed very low to low measurement variability, with better results for AUTO.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 2D-ST derived GLS is a feasible technique to assess systolic function with low measurement variability. Whenever possible, GLSAV should be determined, although GLSA4C might be a potential alternative.
ANIMALS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: This prospective study included 120 healthy, client-owned DP presented for screening evaluation. Global longitudinal strain of the apical four- (GLSA4C ), two-, and three-chamber view as well as the average GLS of all three views combined (GLSAV ) were determined, compared, and reference values established. Measurement variability was assessed by using intra- and inter-observer coefficient of variation.
RESULTS: A small difference existed for GLSAV (mean + 0.23%; P=0.022) between the two software programs although the determined strain values were similar and positively correlated (r = 0.84; P<0.001). No difference could be found between GLSAV and GLSA4C for AUTO (mean + 0.16%; P=0.228), whereas a difference existed for Cardiac Performance Analysis (mean -0.89% (end-systolic strain) and -0.56% (peak strain), P<0.0001). Software specific reference values were established for GLSAV and GLSA4C . Intra- and inter-observer coefficient of variation revealed very low to low measurement variability, with better results for AUTO.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 2D-ST derived GLS is a feasible technique to assess systolic function with low measurement variability. Whenever possible, GLSAV should be determined, although GLSA4C might be a potential alternative.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app