We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Efficacy of 3 Adjuvant Medications Used in Combination with Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Caesarian Section Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND: A number of different medications are used in combination with intrathecal bupivacaine for cesarean section anesthesia, but their relative efficacy has not been well established.
OBJECTIVE: To study the relative efficacy of adding either intrathecal fentanyl, intrathecal sufentanil, or intravenous acetaminophen-morphine-fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for pain control in elective cesarean section operations.
METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial, 105 pregnant women eligible for cesarean section received 10 mg intrathecal bupivacaine (0.5%) in combination with 2 μg intrathecal sufentanil (group 1), 10 μg intrathecal fentanyl (group 2), and an intravenous cocktail of 1 g acetaminophen, 5 mg morphine, and 100 μg fentanyl (group 3). Patients were assessed for analgesia, time to block, and adverse effects.
RESULTS: The 3 groups were similar in terms of the time to onset of sensory block and the duration of both sensory and motor block. Groups 1 and 3 differed significantly in the time to peak sensory block, whereas group 1 differed significantly from groups 2 and 3 in the time to peak motor block. The sensory block level reached T4 in most patients. Significant differences in pain (visual analog scale) were demonstrated between groups 1 and 3 at 5 minutes after spinal injection, between groups 1 and 2 at the end of the surgery and upon arrival to the recovery room, and between all groups in the recovery room.
CONCLUSIONS: When used in addition to 10 mg intrathecal bupivacaine, an intravenous cocktail of 1 g acetaminophen-5 mg morphine-100 μg fentanyl was as efficient as either 10 μg intrathecal fentanyl or 2 μg intrathecal sufentanil in terms of sensory and motor block duration and produced a higher dermatomal level of sensory block. However, intrathecal sufentanil provided better anesthesia quality (less time to onset of motor block and peak sensory-motor block) and better pain control. ( Curr Ther Res Clin Exp . 2023; 84:XXX-XXX).
OBJECTIVE: To study the relative efficacy of adding either intrathecal fentanyl, intrathecal sufentanil, or intravenous acetaminophen-morphine-fentanyl to intrathecal bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for pain control in elective cesarean section operations.
METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial, 105 pregnant women eligible for cesarean section received 10 mg intrathecal bupivacaine (0.5%) in combination with 2 μg intrathecal sufentanil (group 1), 10 μg intrathecal fentanyl (group 2), and an intravenous cocktail of 1 g acetaminophen, 5 mg morphine, and 100 μg fentanyl (group 3). Patients were assessed for analgesia, time to block, and adverse effects.
RESULTS: The 3 groups were similar in terms of the time to onset of sensory block and the duration of both sensory and motor block. Groups 1 and 3 differed significantly in the time to peak sensory block, whereas group 1 differed significantly from groups 2 and 3 in the time to peak motor block. The sensory block level reached T4 in most patients. Significant differences in pain (visual analog scale) were demonstrated between groups 1 and 3 at 5 minutes after spinal injection, between groups 1 and 2 at the end of the surgery and upon arrival to the recovery room, and between all groups in the recovery room.
CONCLUSIONS: When used in addition to 10 mg intrathecal bupivacaine, an intravenous cocktail of 1 g acetaminophen-5 mg morphine-100 μg fentanyl was as efficient as either 10 μg intrathecal fentanyl or 2 μg intrathecal sufentanil in terms of sensory and motor block duration and produced a higher dermatomal level of sensory block. However, intrathecal sufentanil provided better anesthesia quality (less time to onset of motor block and peak sensory-motor block) and better pain control. ( Curr Ther Res Clin Exp . 2023; 84:XXX-XXX).
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app