We have located links that may give you full text access.
Executive (dys)functions and ODD and CD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Neuropsychology 2022 November 29
OBJECTIVE: Precursors of antisocial behavior in children may be associated with neuropsychological deficits, namely in executive functions (EF). The main objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence of the relation between EF performance and early manifestations of antisocial behavior in children and adolescents.
METHOD: The procedures of this systematic review and meta-analysis were based on the PRISMA recommendations. The review was based on a systematic search in the EBSCOhost and Pubmed databases. Fifty studies were included in this review, 37 of which contributed with data for meta-analysis. All studies examined the possible relation between the EF measures and behavior problems in childhood and adolescence. Meta-analytical procedures were performed, and the overall effect size was calculated from random-effect models, using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.
RESULTS: A substantial part of the studies report EF deficits in children and adolescents who present behavior problems, revealing that these deficits are already present in youth, long before being associated with antisocial behavior in adults, especially when in comorbidity with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Specifically, typical controls (TC) performed significantly better than disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) groups on measures of overall EF, g = -.35, 95% CI [-0.48, -0.22], p < .001. Similar results were found for working memory, g = -.26, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.07], p < .001, cognitive inhibition, g = -.30, 95% CI [-0.57, -0.04], p = .03, behavioral inhibition, g = -.45, 95% CI [-0.71, -0.19], p = .001, and cognitive flexibility (tests scores), g = -.31, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.02], p = .04. Comparing DBD + ADHD participants with TC, no significant differences were found, either for overall EF or for each dimension. Finally, DBD participants performed better than DBD + ADHD participants on measures of overall EF, g = .20, 95% CI [0.08, 0.33], p = .002.
CONCLUSION: These findings are in line with neuropsychological theories arguing that executive dysfunctions may interfere with the children's and/or adolescents' ability to control their own conduct, in order to inhibit inappropriate behaviors in favor of the prosocial ones. This review and meta-analysis also identify the main characteristics and potential limitations of the existing studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
METHOD: The procedures of this systematic review and meta-analysis were based on the PRISMA recommendations. The review was based on a systematic search in the EBSCOhost and Pubmed databases. Fifty studies were included in this review, 37 of which contributed with data for meta-analysis. All studies examined the possible relation between the EF measures and behavior problems in childhood and adolescence. Meta-analytical procedures were performed, and the overall effect size was calculated from random-effect models, using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.
RESULTS: A substantial part of the studies report EF deficits in children and adolescents who present behavior problems, revealing that these deficits are already present in youth, long before being associated with antisocial behavior in adults, especially when in comorbidity with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Specifically, typical controls (TC) performed significantly better than disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) groups on measures of overall EF, g = -.35, 95% CI [-0.48, -0.22], p < .001. Similar results were found for working memory, g = -.26, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.07], p < .001, cognitive inhibition, g = -.30, 95% CI [-0.57, -0.04], p = .03, behavioral inhibition, g = -.45, 95% CI [-0.71, -0.19], p = .001, and cognitive flexibility (tests scores), g = -.31, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.02], p = .04. Comparing DBD + ADHD participants with TC, no significant differences were found, either for overall EF or for each dimension. Finally, DBD participants performed better than DBD + ADHD participants on measures of overall EF, g = .20, 95% CI [0.08, 0.33], p = .002.
CONCLUSION: These findings are in line with neuropsychological theories arguing that executive dysfunctions may interfere with the children's and/or adolescents' ability to control their own conduct, in order to inhibit inappropriate behaviors in favor of the prosocial ones. This review and meta-analysis also identify the main characteristics and potential limitations of the existing studies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app