We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial].
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the new drug Prospekta in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in patients aged 7-12 years.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter (35 clinical centres) double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial enrolled 363 patients. The mean age was 9.3±1.7 years. Children of both sexes aged between 7 and 12 years with a diagnosis of ADHD confirmed by DSM-V diagnostic criteria were included in the study. Patients with a total score of 22 or more on the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale-V (ADHD-RS-V) were included in the study. After randomisation, patients in group 1 received Prospekta, 1 tablet twice daily; patients in group 2 received placebo according to the study drug regimen. The primary efficacy criterion was the proportion of patients with a 25% or greater reduction in the overall ADHD-RS-V scale score after 8 weeks of treatment. As additional criteria for efficacy assessment were assessed: change of ADHD-RS-V total score from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment; Clinical Global Impression Efficacy Index (CGI-EI) score after 8 weeks of treatment; side effects.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with a 25% or more reduction in the ADHD-RS-V scale score after 8 weeks of treatment was 55.9% in the Prospekta group, and 43.3% in the placebo group ( p =0.0199). There was a reduction of ADHD symptoms in the Prospekta group as a mean ADHD-RS-V score decreased by 10.2±7.7 (in the placebo group by 8.1±7.9); the difference between the mean ADHD-RS-V score reduction during Prospekta and placebo treatment was 2.09±7.81 ( p =0.0096). Mean CGI-EI scores calculated on the basis of physician scores were different in the Prospekta group compared to the placebo group at 6.9±3.2 versus 8.0±3.1 ( p =0.0012), indicating greater clinical efficacy of the study drug. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) did not differ significantly between the groups. There were a total of 66 AEs in 46 patients, including 31 AEs in 23 (13.2%) Prospekta group participants and 35 AEs in 23 (12.2%) placebo group participants ( p =0.87). No cases of serious AEs were reported during the study. Prospekta is compatible with drugs used in pediatric practice. Prospekta did not cause an exciting effect and did not adversely affect the sleep of patients.
CONCLUSION: The drug Prospekta is an effective and safe treatment for ADHD in patients 7-12 years old.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter (35 clinical centres) double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial enrolled 363 patients. The mean age was 9.3±1.7 years. Children of both sexes aged between 7 and 12 years with a diagnosis of ADHD confirmed by DSM-V diagnostic criteria were included in the study. Patients with a total score of 22 or more on the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Rating Scale-V (ADHD-RS-V) were included in the study. After randomisation, patients in group 1 received Prospekta, 1 tablet twice daily; patients in group 2 received placebo according to the study drug regimen. The primary efficacy criterion was the proportion of patients with a 25% or greater reduction in the overall ADHD-RS-V scale score after 8 weeks of treatment. As additional criteria for efficacy assessment were assessed: change of ADHD-RS-V total score from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment; Clinical Global Impression Efficacy Index (CGI-EI) score after 8 weeks of treatment; side effects.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with a 25% or more reduction in the ADHD-RS-V scale score after 8 weeks of treatment was 55.9% in the Prospekta group, and 43.3% in the placebo group ( p =0.0199). There was a reduction of ADHD symptoms in the Prospekta group as a mean ADHD-RS-V score decreased by 10.2±7.7 (in the placebo group by 8.1±7.9); the difference between the mean ADHD-RS-V score reduction during Prospekta and placebo treatment was 2.09±7.81 ( p =0.0096). Mean CGI-EI scores calculated on the basis of physician scores were different in the Prospekta group compared to the placebo group at 6.9±3.2 versus 8.0±3.1 ( p =0.0012), indicating greater clinical efficacy of the study drug. The frequency of adverse events (AEs) did not differ significantly between the groups. There were a total of 66 AEs in 46 patients, including 31 AEs in 23 (13.2%) Prospekta group participants and 35 AEs in 23 (12.2%) placebo group participants ( p =0.87). No cases of serious AEs were reported during the study. Prospekta is compatible with drugs used in pediatric practice. Prospekta did not cause an exciting effect and did not adversely affect the sleep of patients.
CONCLUSION: The drug Prospekta is an effective and safe treatment for ADHD in patients 7-12 years old.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app