Radiation Dose Exposure to Patients During Transcatheter Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure via the Arterial Route.

Objective This study aims to evaluate the radiation dose for transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) via the arterial route and compare it with previously published benchmarks. Background Exposure to radiation in the catheterization lab can cause skin injury and cancer in the long run, especially in pediatric patients with complex heart conditions, which necessitate serial catheterizations. Therefore, measuring the patient radiation dose and establishing a benchmark for each cardiac interventional procedure is essential. Material and methods In this prospective study, 34 patients with transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure via an arterial route were included. Patients who had silent PDAs, no left heart dilatation and PDA size of less than 2mm had PDA closed via an arterial route. All the study group patients received an Amplatzer duct occluder II-additional size device (St. Jude Medical Corp, St. Paul, MN) using biplane flat-panel fluoroscopy equipment adjusted in accordance with the pediatric parameters. Patients' dose area product, air kerma and fluoroscopy time were recorded in the catheterization lab and finally compared with internationally published reference data. Results Of 73 patients who had transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure between April 2021 to December 2021, 34 patients who had a PDA closure via an arterial route were enrolled. The median age and weight were 11.5 (4-168) months and 10.5 (6-31) kg. Twenty-one (61.8%) were males, and 13 (38.2%) were males. The median radiation dose parameters were as follows: air kerma 11 (3-42) milliGray, dose area product 131 (33-443) microGray per m2 , median dose area product indexed to weight 12 (1-48) microGray m2 per kg, fluoroscopy time 2 (2-4) min and frame rate 15 (7.5-15) frames per second. Due to many factors, our radiation dose parameters were less than internationally published reference values for transcatheter PDA closure. Conclusion Patient selection, detailed pre-catheterization echocardiography and procedure planning are essential for accomplishing device closure of PDA with a significant reduction in radiation dose. Hemodynamic assessment in the catheterization lab is unnecessary for most PDA patients. Additionally, a next-generation imaging platform equipped with flat-panel detectors and adjusted for pediatric settings and a fluoro recording option can be used to reduce radiation exposure.