We have located links that may give you full text access.
Sexual functioning more than 15 years after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2022 November 18
BACKGROUND: Women with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant are advised to undergo premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy after completion of childbearing, to reduce their risk of ovarian cancer. Several studies reported less sexual pleasure one to three years after a premenopausal oophorectomy. However, the long-term effects of a premenopausal oophorectomy on sexual functioning are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study long-term sexual functioning in women at increased familial risk of breast/ovarian cancer who underwent a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy either before the age of 46 years (premenopausal group), or after the age of 54 years (postmenopausal group). We performed subgroup analyses in the premenopausal group, comparing early (before the age of 41 years) and later (at ages 41-45 years) premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
STUDY DESIGN: Between 2018 and 2021, we invited 817 women with a high familial risk of breast/ovarian cancer from an ongoing cohort study to participate in our study. Due to a large difference in age at study between the premenopausal and postmenopausal salpingo-oophorectomy groups, we restricted the comparison of sexual functioning between the groups to 368 women who were 60-70 years old at completion of the questionnaire (premenopausal group, n=226, postmenopausal group, n=142). In 496 women with a premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy we compared sexual functioning between women in the early premenopausal group (n=151) and the later premenopausal group (n=345). Differences between groups were analyzed using multiple regression analyses adjusting for current age, breast cancer history, use of hormone replacement therapy, body mass index, chronic medication use (yes/no) and body image.
RESULTS: Mean time since risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was 20.6 years in the premenopausal group and 10.6 years in the postmenopausal group (p-value <.001). In the premenopausal group, mean age at questionnaire completion was 62.7 years, versus 67.0 years in the postmenopausal group (p<.001). In the premenopausal group, 47.4% was still sexually active, compared to 48.9% of the postmenopausal group (p-value: .80). Current sexual pleasure scores were the same for women in the premenopausal group and the postmenopausal group (mean pleasure score 8.6, p-value .99). However, women in the premenopausal group more often reported substantial discomfort than women in the postmenopausal group (35.6% compared with 20.9%, p-value .04). After adjusting for confounders, premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with substantially more discomfort during sexual intercourse, compared to postmenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.04; 9.4). Moreover, following premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, more severe complaints of vaginal dryness were observed (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4; 4.7). Women with a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy before age 41 reported similar pleasure and discomfort scores as women with a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between ages 41 and 45.
CONCLUSION: More than 15 years after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, the proportion of sexually active women was comparable to that among women with a postmenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. However, after a premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, women experienced more vaginal dryness and more often had substantial sexual discomfort during sexual intercourse. This did not lead to less pleasure with sexual activity.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study long-term sexual functioning in women at increased familial risk of breast/ovarian cancer who underwent a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy either before the age of 46 years (premenopausal group), or after the age of 54 years (postmenopausal group). We performed subgroup analyses in the premenopausal group, comparing early (before the age of 41 years) and later (at ages 41-45 years) premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
STUDY DESIGN: Between 2018 and 2021, we invited 817 women with a high familial risk of breast/ovarian cancer from an ongoing cohort study to participate in our study. Due to a large difference in age at study between the premenopausal and postmenopausal salpingo-oophorectomy groups, we restricted the comparison of sexual functioning between the groups to 368 women who were 60-70 years old at completion of the questionnaire (premenopausal group, n=226, postmenopausal group, n=142). In 496 women with a premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy we compared sexual functioning between women in the early premenopausal group (n=151) and the later premenopausal group (n=345). Differences between groups were analyzed using multiple regression analyses adjusting for current age, breast cancer history, use of hormone replacement therapy, body mass index, chronic medication use (yes/no) and body image.
RESULTS: Mean time since risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was 20.6 years in the premenopausal group and 10.6 years in the postmenopausal group (p-value <.001). In the premenopausal group, mean age at questionnaire completion was 62.7 years, versus 67.0 years in the postmenopausal group (p<.001). In the premenopausal group, 47.4% was still sexually active, compared to 48.9% of the postmenopausal group (p-value: .80). Current sexual pleasure scores were the same for women in the premenopausal group and the postmenopausal group (mean pleasure score 8.6, p-value .99). However, women in the premenopausal group more often reported substantial discomfort than women in the postmenopausal group (35.6% compared with 20.9%, p-value .04). After adjusting for confounders, premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with substantially more discomfort during sexual intercourse, compared to postmenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (odds ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.04; 9.4). Moreover, following premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, more severe complaints of vaginal dryness were observed (odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4; 4.7). Women with a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy before age 41 reported similar pleasure and discomfort scores as women with a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy between ages 41 and 45.
CONCLUSION: More than 15 years after premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, the proportion of sexually active women was comparable to that among women with a postmenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. However, after a premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, women experienced more vaginal dryness and more often had substantial sexual discomfort during sexual intercourse. This did not lead to less pleasure with sexual activity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app