We have located links that may give you full text access.
Systemic lupus erythematosus phenotypes formed from machine learning with a specific focus on cognitive impairment.
Rheumatology 2022 November 18
OBJECTIVE: To phenotype SLE based on symptom burden (disease damage, system involvement and patient reported outcomes), with a specific focus on objective and subjective cognitive function.
METHODS: SLE patients aged 18-65 underwent objective cognitive assessment using the ACR Neuropsychological Battery (ACR-NB) and data was collected on demographic and clinical variables, disease burden/activity, health related quality of life (HRQoL), depression, anxiety, fatigue and perceived cognitive deficits. Similarity network fusion (SNF) was used to identify patient subtypes. Differences between the subtypes were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests.
RESULTS: Of the 238 patients, 90% were female, mean age 41 ± 12 and disease duration 14 ± 10 years at the study visit. The SNF analysis defined two subtypes (A and B) with distinct patterns in objective and subjective cognitive function, disease burden/damage, HRQoL, anxiety and depression. Subtype A performed worst on all significantly different tests of objective cognitive function (p < 0.03) compared with subtype B. Subtype A also, had greater levels of subjective cognitive function (p < 0.001), disease burden/damage (p < 0.04), HRQoL (p < 0.001) and psychiatric measures (p < 0.001) compared with subtype B.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the complexity of cognitive impairment (CI) in SLE and that individual, multi-factorial phenotypes exist. Those with greater disease burden, from SLE specific factors or other factors associated with chronic conditions, report poorer cognitive functioning and perform worse on objective cognitive measures. By exploring different ways of phenotyping SLE we may better define CI in SLE. Ultimately, this will aid our understanding of personalised CI trajectories and identification of appropriate treatments.
METHODS: SLE patients aged 18-65 underwent objective cognitive assessment using the ACR Neuropsychological Battery (ACR-NB) and data was collected on demographic and clinical variables, disease burden/activity, health related quality of life (HRQoL), depression, anxiety, fatigue and perceived cognitive deficits. Similarity network fusion (SNF) was used to identify patient subtypes. Differences between the subtypes were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests.
RESULTS: Of the 238 patients, 90% were female, mean age 41 ± 12 and disease duration 14 ± 10 years at the study visit. The SNF analysis defined two subtypes (A and B) with distinct patterns in objective and subjective cognitive function, disease burden/damage, HRQoL, anxiety and depression. Subtype A performed worst on all significantly different tests of objective cognitive function (p < 0.03) compared with subtype B. Subtype A also, had greater levels of subjective cognitive function (p < 0.001), disease burden/damage (p < 0.04), HRQoL (p < 0.001) and psychiatric measures (p < 0.001) compared with subtype B.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the complexity of cognitive impairment (CI) in SLE and that individual, multi-factorial phenotypes exist. Those with greater disease burden, from SLE specific factors or other factors associated with chronic conditions, report poorer cognitive functioning and perform worse on objective cognitive measures. By exploring different ways of phenotyping SLE we may better define CI in SLE. Ultimately, this will aid our understanding of personalised CI trajectories and identification of appropriate treatments.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app