We have located links that may give you full text access.
Quantifying the Effective Lift of Skin-Only, SMAS Plication, and Extended SMAS Face-Lift Techniques in a Cadaveric Study.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2023 Februrary 1
BACKGROUND: Rhytidectomies are performed to rejuvenate the aging face. Various techniques exist to achieve soft-tissue elevation and skin tightening. This study analyzes three common face-lift techniques: skin-only, superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication, and extended SMAS lifts. The authors characterize effective facial changes with each procedure in a cadaver model.
METHODS: The authors performed face-lift procedures on 18 cadaver hemifaces. Each face was measured along horizontal and vertical vectors. The primary outcome was change along these vectors. Skin-only, SMAS plication, and extended SMAS lifts were performed sequentially on each hemiface. SMAS plication was used to approximate a lateral SMASectomy procedure. Parameter measurements were compared.
RESULTS: All three procedures exhibited a significant tightening along horizontal vectors. SMAS procedures provided a significant lift along all vertical vectors, whereas the skin-only lift failed to demonstrate significant vertical elevation. SMAS procedures achieved significantly greater composite horizontal and vertical lifts compared to the skin-only operation. There was only an incremental increase in lift between the SMAS plication and extended SMAS procedures in the upper and midface regions. The extended SMAS led to the greatest lift in the lower face.
CONCLUSIONS: SMAS procedures provided a greater lift along both horizontal and vertical vectors than the skin lift alone. The increased dissection in the extended SMAS technique resulted in only a modest increase in lift compared to SMAS plication. The extended SMAS approach appears to offer the most benefit at the lower face and may be the best choice for targeting this region.
METHODS: The authors performed face-lift procedures on 18 cadaver hemifaces. Each face was measured along horizontal and vertical vectors. The primary outcome was change along these vectors. Skin-only, SMAS plication, and extended SMAS lifts were performed sequentially on each hemiface. SMAS plication was used to approximate a lateral SMASectomy procedure. Parameter measurements were compared.
RESULTS: All three procedures exhibited a significant tightening along horizontal vectors. SMAS procedures provided a significant lift along all vertical vectors, whereas the skin-only lift failed to demonstrate significant vertical elevation. SMAS procedures achieved significantly greater composite horizontal and vertical lifts compared to the skin-only operation. There was only an incremental increase in lift between the SMAS plication and extended SMAS procedures in the upper and midface regions. The extended SMAS led to the greatest lift in the lower face.
CONCLUSIONS: SMAS procedures provided a greater lift along both horizontal and vertical vectors than the skin lift alone. The increased dissection in the extended SMAS technique resulted in only a modest increase in lift compared to SMAS plication. The extended SMAS approach appears to offer the most benefit at the lower face and may be the best choice for targeting this region.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Updated evidence on cardiovascular and renal effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and combination therapy with SGLT2 inhibitors and finerenone: a narrative review and perspectives.Cardiovascular Diabetology 2024 November 15
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app