Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Accuracy evaluation of mainstream and sidestream end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during noninvasive ventilation: a randomized crossover trial (MASCAT-NIV trial).

BACKGROUND: The end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PET CO2 ) can be used to estimate the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2 ) in patients who undergo mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation. However, no reliable method for measuring PET CO2 during noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement between PaCO2 and PET CO2 measured by these two methods and to compare them in patients who underwent NIV after extubation.

METHODS: This study was a randomized, open-label, crossover trial in a mixed intensive care unit. We included patients who were planned for NIV after extubation and for whom the difference between PET CO2 and PaCO2 was ≤ 5 mmHg. We compared mainstream capnography using an inner cup via face mask (the novel method) with sidestream capnography (the previous method) during NIV. The relationships between PaCO2 and PET CO2 were evaluated by computing the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the agreement between PaCO2 and PET CO2 was estimated using the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS: From April 2020 to October 2021, 60 patients were included to the study. PaCO2 and PET CO2 were well correlated in both methods (the novel methods: r = 0.92, P < 0.001; the previous method: r = 0.79, P < 0.001). Mean bias between PaCO2 and PET CO2 measured using the novel method was 2.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.15-3.26) mmHg with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) ranging from - 1.61 to 7.02 mmHg, similar to the result of measurement during SBT (mean bias, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.00-3.02; 95% LoA, - 1.45 to 6.47 mmHg). In contrast, measurement using the previous method demonstrated a larger difference (mean bias, 6.22; 95% CI, 5.22-7.23; 95% LoA, - 1.54 to 13.99 mmHg).

CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that the novel PET CO2 measurement was superior to the previous method for PaCO2 prediction. During NIV, the novel method may collect as sufficient exhalation sample as during intubation. Continuous PET CO2 measurement combined with peripheral oxygen saturation monitoring is expected to be useful for early recognition of respiratory failure among high-risk patients after extubation. Trial registration UMIN-CTR UMIN000039459. Registered February 11, 2020.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app