We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Parapneumonic Effusions Are Characterized by Elevated Levels of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.
Chest 2021 November
BACKGROUND: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) increasingly are implicated in acute and chronic conditions involving multiple organ systems.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Are NET concentrations higher in parapneumonic effusions compared with effusions of other origin and does this reflect the inflammatory nature of these effusions?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (N = 101) seeking hospital treatment for undifferentiated pleural effusion underwent pleural fluid classification based on cytologic analysis results, biochemical findings, microbiological characteristics, and clinical judgement. Concentrations of NET markers (extracellular DNA [eDNA], citrullinated histone H3 [citH3]), neutrophils (α-defensins), and inflammation (IL-1β)-related proteins were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Differences between groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Correlations used Spearman coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated.
RESULTS: Effusions were classified into four groups: parapneumonic (n = 18), malignant (n = 35), transudative (n = 22), and unclassifiable (n = 26). Concentrations of NETs markers were significantly higher in the parapneumonic group compared with malignant, transudative, and unclassifiable groups (median eDNA, 12.8 ng/mL vs 0.77 ng/mL, 0.44 ng/mL, and 0.86 ng/mL [P < .001]; and median citH3, 127.1 ng/mL vs 0.44 ng/mL, 0.34 ng/mL, and 0.49 ng/mL [P < .001]). citH3 and eDNA were correlated highly with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; Spearman r = 0.66 and r = 0.73, respectively; P < .001) and moderately negatively correlated with pH (r = -0.55 and r = -0.62, respectively; P < .001). α-Defensins and IL-1β were higher in the parapneumonic group than in other groups (median α-defensins, 124.4 ng/mL vs 4.7 ng/mL,7 ng/mL, and 6.9 ng/mL [P < .001]; and median IL-1β, 145 pg/mL vs 1.87 pg/mL, 1.39 pg/mL, and 2.6 pg/mL [P < .001]) and moderately correlated with LDH (r = 0.60 and r = 0.57; P < .001). ROC curves showed high sensitivity and specificity for NET markers for prediction of parapneumonic effusion.
INTERPRETATION: High levels of some NET-related mediators in parapneumonic effusions correlate with inflammation. Effusions of other causes do not show high levels of NETs. These results may have treatment implications because NETs may be an important contributor to the inflammation and viscosity of parapneumonic effusions and may help us to understand the therapeutic benefit of deoxyribonuclease in empyema.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Are NET concentrations higher in parapneumonic effusions compared with effusions of other origin and does this reflect the inflammatory nature of these effusions?
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (N = 101) seeking hospital treatment for undifferentiated pleural effusion underwent pleural fluid classification based on cytologic analysis results, biochemical findings, microbiological characteristics, and clinical judgement. Concentrations of NET markers (extracellular DNA [eDNA], citrullinated histone H3 [citH3]), neutrophils (α-defensins), and inflammation (IL-1β)-related proteins were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Differences between groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance. Correlations used Spearman coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated.
RESULTS: Effusions were classified into four groups: parapneumonic (n = 18), malignant (n = 35), transudative (n = 22), and unclassifiable (n = 26). Concentrations of NETs markers were significantly higher in the parapneumonic group compared with malignant, transudative, and unclassifiable groups (median eDNA, 12.8 ng/mL vs 0.77 ng/mL, 0.44 ng/mL, and 0.86 ng/mL [P < .001]; and median citH3, 127.1 ng/mL vs 0.44 ng/mL, 0.34 ng/mL, and 0.49 ng/mL [P < .001]). citH3 and eDNA were correlated highly with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; Spearman r = 0.66 and r = 0.73, respectively; P < .001) and moderately negatively correlated with pH (r = -0.55 and r = -0.62, respectively; P < .001). α-Defensins and IL-1β were higher in the parapneumonic group than in other groups (median α-defensins, 124.4 ng/mL vs 4.7 ng/mL,7 ng/mL, and 6.9 ng/mL [P < .001]; and median IL-1β, 145 pg/mL vs 1.87 pg/mL, 1.39 pg/mL, and 2.6 pg/mL [P < .001]) and moderately correlated with LDH (r = 0.60 and r = 0.57; P < .001). ROC curves showed high sensitivity and specificity for NET markers for prediction of parapneumonic effusion.
INTERPRETATION: High levels of some NET-related mediators in parapneumonic effusions correlate with inflammation. Effusions of other causes do not show high levels of NETs. These results may have treatment implications because NETs may be an important contributor to the inflammation and viscosity of parapneumonic effusions and may help us to understand the therapeutic benefit of deoxyribonuclease in empyema.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app