We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Discrimination between the presence and absence of spontaneous circulation using smartphone seismocardiography: A preliminary investigation.
Resuscitation 2021 September
BACKGROUND: Seismocardiography measures the vibrations produced by the beating heart using an accelerometer sensor placed on the chest. We evaluated the ability of smartphone seismocardiography to distinguish between the presence and absence of spontaneous circulation.
METHODS: Seismocardiography signals were obtained using a smartphone placed on the sternum in a convenience sample of 60 adult patients (30 comatose patients with spontaneous circulation and 30 deceased patients). The maximum, minimum, and standard deviation (SD) of acceleration values for head-to-foot, right-to-left, and dorsoventral axes and the three axis-root mean square (RMS) of the acceleration signals were calculated. Blinded observers (n = 156) were each asked to determine the presence or absence of spontaneous circulation based on seismocardiography video clips for each of the 60 patients.
RESULTS: The seismocardiography revealed periodic large positive peaks in the patients with spontaneous circulation, which were absent in the patients without spontaneous circulation. For each of the four output measurements (three independent axes plus the three-axis RMS), the acceleration maxima and SD were significantly higher and the minima significantly lower in the patients with spontaneous circulation than in those without spontaneous circulation (all P < 0.001 except the minimum of three axis-RMS results [P = 0.009]). The observers accurately identified the seismocardiography signals from patients without spontaneous circulation, with a sensitivity of 97.6% (95% confidence interval, 97.0%-98.2%) and a specificity of 98.4% (95% confidence interval, 97.8%-99.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, blinded observers accurately distinguished between seismocardiography signals from patients with and without spontaneous circulation.
METHODS: Seismocardiography signals were obtained using a smartphone placed on the sternum in a convenience sample of 60 adult patients (30 comatose patients with spontaneous circulation and 30 deceased patients). The maximum, minimum, and standard deviation (SD) of acceleration values for head-to-foot, right-to-left, and dorsoventral axes and the three axis-root mean square (RMS) of the acceleration signals were calculated. Blinded observers (n = 156) were each asked to determine the presence or absence of spontaneous circulation based on seismocardiography video clips for each of the 60 patients.
RESULTS: The seismocardiography revealed periodic large positive peaks in the patients with spontaneous circulation, which were absent in the patients without spontaneous circulation. For each of the four output measurements (three independent axes plus the three-axis RMS), the acceleration maxima and SD were significantly higher and the minima significantly lower in the patients with spontaneous circulation than in those without spontaneous circulation (all P < 0.001 except the minimum of three axis-RMS results [P = 0.009]). The observers accurately identified the seismocardiography signals from patients without spontaneous circulation, with a sensitivity of 97.6% (95% confidence interval, 97.0%-98.2%) and a specificity of 98.4% (95% confidence interval, 97.8%-99.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, blinded observers accurately distinguished between seismocardiography signals from patients with and without spontaneous circulation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app