We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Eye oscilations with neurological implications in pediatric age.
INTRODUCTION: Eye oscillations, both nystagmic and non-nystagic, can occur from birth. Most correspond to infantile nystagmus that dubates in the first six months of life, which include idiopathic, sensory, latent, or overt latent motor nystagmus. Those associated with neurological diseases or syndromes correspond to approximately 33%, their identification and correct evaluation being important given the potential visual and vital complications.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We made a systematic review of the literature on supranuclear gaze control mechanisms and the main ocular oscillations with possible neurological implications, both in childhood. With this, we intend to assess if there are already established clinical-anatomical associations, and to propose a protocol on the complementary studies to be carried out in these cases.
RESULTS: There are still anatomical pathways involved in supranuclear gaze control that are not fully clarified and understood. Besides, except in the case of nystagmus in seesaw and upbeat, we did not find anatomical explanations for their pathogenesis. The need for complete neuro-ophthalmological physical examinations and the request for additional tests in children who present ocular oscillations with neurological characteristics are clear.
CONCLUSIONS: Supranuclear gaze control follows a complex neurological network that still needs to be studied better. With a better dissection of the same we could try to understand why the ocular oscillations that we studied have these specific forms of presentation. As for the complementary requests, the request for neuroimaging tests is practically constant, making the others according to the specific case before which we find ourselves.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We made a systematic review of the literature on supranuclear gaze control mechanisms and the main ocular oscillations with possible neurological implications, both in childhood. With this, we intend to assess if there are already established clinical-anatomical associations, and to propose a protocol on the complementary studies to be carried out in these cases.
RESULTS: There are still anatomical pathways involved in supranuclear gaze control that are not fully clarified and understood. Besides, except in the case of nystagmus in seesaw and upbeat, we did not find anatomical explanations for their pathogenesis. The need for complete neuro-ophthalmological physical examinations and the request for additional tests in children who present ocular oscillations with neurological characteristics are clear.
CONCLUSIONS: Supranuclear gaze control follows a complex neurological network that still needs to be studied better. With a better dissection of the same we could try to understand why the ocular oscillations that we studied have these specific forms of presentation. As for the complementary requests, the request for neuroimaging tests is practically constant, making the others according to the specific case before which we find ourselves.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app