Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Systemic Sirolimus Therapy for Infants and Children With Pulmonary Vein Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic interventions for pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) in infants and children have been met with limited success. Sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has demonstrated promise as a primary medical therapy for PVS, but the impact on patient survival is unknown.

OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to investigate whether mTOR inhibition with sirolimus as a primary medical therapy would improve outcomes in high-risk infants and children with PVS.

METHODS: In this single-center study, patients with severe PVS were considered for systemic sirolimus therapy (SST) following a strict protocol while receiving standardized surveillance and anatomic therapies. The SST cohort was compared with a contemporary control group. The primary endpoint for this study was survival. The primary safety endpoint was adverse events (AEs) related to SST.

RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, our PVS program diagnosed and treated 67 patients with ≥moderate PVS. Of these, 15 patients were treated with sirolimus, whereas the remaining patients represent the control group. There was 100% survival in the SST group compared with 45% survival in the control group (log-rank p = 0.004). A sensitivity analysis was completed to address survival bias using median time from diagnosis of PVS to SST. A survival advantage persisted (log-rank p = 0.027). Two patients on sirolimus developed treatable AEs. Patients in the SST group underwent frequent transcatheter interventions with 3.7 catheterizations per person-year (25th to 75th percentile: 2.7 to 4.4 person-years). Median follow up time was 2.2 years (25th to 75th percentile: 1.2 to 2.9 years) in the SST group versus 0.9 years (25th to 75th percentile: 0.5 to 2.7 years) in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a survival benefit associated with SST in infants and children with moderate-to-severe PVS. This survival benefit persisted after adjusting the analysis for survival bias. There were 2 mild AEs associated with SST during the study period; both patients were able to resume therapy without recurrence.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app