We have located links that may give you full text access.
The impact of basic atrial rhythm during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on clinical outcomes: Lessons from the German Ablation Registry.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 2021 May 6
BACKGROUND: The impact of basic atrial rhythm (sinus rhythm (SR) vs atrial fibrillation (AF)) during AF ablation on efficacy and safety is unknown.
METHODS: 3375 patients from the German Ablation Registry undergoing first-time AF ablation were divided according to the type of AF and the basic atrial rhythm during the ablation procedure: paroxysmal AF (PAF) and SR [group Ia], PAF and AF [group Ib]), persistent AF and SR (IIa) and persistent AF and AF (IIb).
RESULTS: Patients in SR (n=2312 (67%)) underwent cryoballoon ablation more often (Ia vs Ib p=0.002 and IIa vs IIb p=0.010, whereas in patients in AF (n=1063 (33%)) radiofrequency (RF)-based ablation (Ia vs Ib p=0.006 and IIa vs IIb p=0.014) including left and/or right atrial substrate modification was more frequently performed. Depending on the basic rhythm there was no difference regarding arrhythmia recurrence during long-term follow-up. For patients suffering from persistent AF acute procedure-related complications were more often documented when ablated in AF (9.1% vs. 4.6%, p=0.012). which was mainly driven by the higher occurrence of pericardial effusion/tamponade. For patients suffering from persistent AF, favourable results were found regarding 366-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence of MACCE (death, myocardial infarction and stroke; p=0.011) and the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleeding (p=0.006), when ablated in SR.
CONCLUSION: Basic atrial rhythm at the time of AF ablation did not affect long-term rhythm outcome. For patients suffering from persistent AF a more favorable acute and long-term safety profile was observed when ablated in SR. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
METHODS: 3375 patients from the German Ablation Registry undergoing first-time AF ablation were divided according to the type of AF and the basic atrial rhythm during the ablation procedure: paroxysmal AF (PAF) and SR [group Ia], PAF and AF [group Ib]), persistent AF and SR (IIa) and persistent AF and AF (IIb).
RESULTS: Patients in SR (n=2312 (67%)) underwent cryoballoon ablation more often (Ia vs Ib p=0.002 and IIa vs IIb p=0.010, whereas in patients in AF (n=1063 (33%)) radiofrequency (RF)-based ablation (Ia vs Ib p=0.006 and IIa vs IIb p=0.014) including left and/or right atrial substrate modification was more frequently performed. Depending on the basic rhythm there was no difference regarding arrhythmia recurrence during long-term follow-up. For patients suffering from persistent AF acute procedure-related complications were more often documented when ablated in AF (9.1% vs. 4.6%, p=0.012). which was mainly driven by the higher occurrence of pericardial effusion/tamponade. For patients suffering from persistent AF, favourable results were found regarding 366-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence of MACCE (death, myocardial infarction and stroke; p=0.011) and the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke and major bleeding (p=0.006), when ablated in SR.
CONCLUSION: Basic atrial rhythm at the time of AF ablation did not affect long-term rhythm outcome. For patients suffering from persistent AF a more favorable acute and long-term safety profile was observed when ablated in SR. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app