We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Athletes Following Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement with Sub-analysis on Return to Sport and Competition Level: A Systematic Review.
Arthroscopy 2021 April 20
PURPOSE: To identify present trends in demographics, surgical indications, preoperative findings, and surgical treatment of athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI and (2) to investigate the outcomes in this patient population, including patient-reported outcome scores (PROS), return-to-sport (RTS), complications, and reoperation data at minimum 2-year follow-up in the athletic population.
METHODS: Cochrane, Embase, and Pubmed databases were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to distinguish articles that reported PROS after hip arthroscopy in athletes. Athletes were defined as anyone who played a sport for minimum 2-years at any level. The standardized mean difference was calculated to compare the effect size of hip arthroscopy on various PROS.
RESULTS: Eighteen studies, with 904 athlete hips and a collective study period of January 1993-April 2017, were included in this systematic review. Across all studies, the mean age and body mass index (BMI) ranged from 15.7-36.7 years and 20.3-26.3 kg/m2, respectively. The follow-up range was 24-240 months. Mean preoperative alpha angle ranged from 57.7o -80.0o . Athletes most commonly underwent femoroplasty and labral management. At latest follow-up, the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were excellent in 6 studies (range, 92.1-98), good in ten studies (range, 84.2-88.5), and fair in one study (77.1). Each studies' individual athletic cohort showed significant improvement on the mHHS, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, the HOS-Sport-Specific Subscale, visual analog scale for pain, and International Hip Outcome Tool at latest follow-up (P<.05). The RTS rate ranged from 72.7-100%, with 74.2-100% of these athletes returning to preinjury or higher level.
CONCLUSION: Athletes undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery in the setting of FAI, not only exhibit significant functional improvement, but also have a high rate of return to sport at the same or higher competition level compared to preinjury level.
METHODS: Cochrane, Embase, and Pubmed databases were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to distinguish articles that reported PROS after hip arthroscopy in athletes. Athletes were defined as anyone who played a sport for minimum 2-years at any level. The standardized mean difference was calculated to compare the effect size of hip arthroscopy on various PROS.
RESULTS: Eighteen studies, with 904 athlete hips and a collective study period of January 1993-April 2017, were included in this systematic review. Across all studies, the mean age and body mass index (BMI) ranged from 15.7-36.7 years and 20.3-26.3 kg/m2, respectively. The follow-up range was 24-240 months. Mean preoperative alpha angle ranged from 57.7o -80.0o . Athletes most commonly underwent femoroplasty and labral management. At latest follow-up, the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) were excellent in 6 studies (range, 92.1-98), good in ten studies (range, 84.2-88.5), and fair in one study (77.1). Each studies' individual athletic cohort showed significant improvement on the mHHS, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, the HOS-Sport-Specific Subscale, visual analog scale for pain, and International Hip Outcome Tool at latest follow-up (P<.05). The RTS rate ranged from 72.7-100%, with 74.2-100% of these athletes returning to preinjury or higher level.
CONCLUSION: Athletes undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery in the setting of FAI, not only exhibit significant functional improvement, but also have a high rate of return to sport at the same or higher competition level compared to preinjury level.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app