A narrative review on the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in the context of chronic venous disease.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic venous disease (CVD) describes a spectrum of conditions associated with venous hypertension. The association between various CVD etiologies and the subsequent risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, is a topic of considerable clinical interest. The aims of the present review were to characterize the risk of VTE according to the CVD etiology and to determine the optimal anticoagulation strategy for the treatment or prevention of VTE in patients with CVD.

METHODS: An extensive search of the available surgical and medical data was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. We searched for the following terms and other related terms to identify relevant studies: CVD, chronic venous insufficiency, varicose veins, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), anticoagulation, venous thromboembolism, and venous disease scoring systems (eg, CEAP [clinical, etiology, anatomic, pathophysiology], Villalta, Ginsberg, venous clinical severity score). The identified studies included randomized control trials, retrospective and prospective observational studies, narrative and systematic reviews, case reports, and case series that contributed to the proposed aims. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was also queried to identify any relevant ongoing clinical trials.

RESULTS: Congenital CVD carries a heightened risk of VTE, although few higher level studies are available to inform on this topic or on the appropriate anticoagulation strategies for these patients. Noncongenital CVD seems to carry a heightened risk of VTE, although few studies have adequately differentiated between primary and secondary etiologies. Varicose veins are a risk factor for primary VTE but might not be associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE. In the hospital setting, patients with varicosities should be provided thromboprophylaxis. In the setting of varicose vein intervention, high-risk patients should be identified using risk assessment models and receive thromboprophylaxis. The risk of recurrent VTE in the setting of PTS is unclear but indefinite anticoagulation is not currently indicated. For patients with PTS, residual vein thrombosis might be an indicator of when anticoagulation can be safely stopped, although practical limitations to its application exist.

CONCLUSIONS: CVD is associated with an increased risk of VTE. Few studies have differentiated between classes of CVD using a standardized method and have assessed the efficacy of anticoagulation prophylaxis against or treatment of VTE. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal therapy for preventing and treating VTE in patients with active concurrent CVD.