JOURNAL ARTICLE

Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Trisha Greenhalgh, Jose L Jimenez, Kimberly A Prather, Zeynep Tufekci, David Fisman, Robert Schooley
Lancet 2021 April 15
33865497
No abstract text is available yet for this article.

Full Text Links

We have located links that may give you full text access.

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Responses

Sort by: Most RecentHighest Rated

John Welden

In other words, at the start of 2020, “decades of research” demonstrated covid transmission was most likely airborne, but public officials ignored this and for some as yet unexplained reason adopted a health policy from 1918.

0

John Gannon

Anecdotal supposition is not enough to support this claim. It is surprising that aerosol sampling techniques have failed to produce evidence of viable SARS-CoV-2 particles for culture.
Thus we must continue to assume that methods of transmission include aerosol, large droplet and fomites.

-5

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
33865497
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"