We have located links that may give you full text access.
The possibility of cochlear synaptopathy in young people using a personal listening device.
Auris, Nasus, Larynx 2021 April 4
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of listening to music loudly through personal listening devices with cochlear synaptopathy in young adults.
METHODS: Fifty healthy young adults selected among 109 volunteers were included in the study. Participants of high risk (n=25) and low risk (n=25) groups estimated according to ETDNL (estimated total daily noise level) were evaluated using pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, matrix test, electrocochleography (EcochG) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) to evaluate the occurrence of cochlear synaptopathy.
RESULTS: Audiometric thresholds between the groups were not significantly different (p>0.05). High risk group participants showed poorer performance than the low-risk group on the TurMatrix test, in non-adaptive noise with -5 SNR and -7.5 SNR, and at the 50% understanding SNR level with headphones (p<0.01). There was no difference in the adaptive free field in noise test at which 50% understanding was achieved (p>0.05). The AP amplitudes on EcochG and wave V amplitudes on ABR were significantly smaller in the high-risk group (p<0.05). There was no association between ETDNL and I/V ratio on ABR.
CONCLUSION: Poorer performance in TurMatrix and other electrophysiologic tests revealed the negative effect of personal listening devices on the auditory system. Our findings support the hypothesis that personal listening devices could cause cochlear synaptopathy. Long-term studies are needed to determine the effects of binaural hearing and duration of noise exposure on the auditory system.
METHODS: Fifty healthy young adults selected among 109 volunteers were included in the study. Participants of high risk (n=25) and low risk (n=25) groups estimated according to ETDNL (estimated total daily noise level) were evaluated using pure tone audiometry, tympanometry, matrix test, electrocochleography (EcochG) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) to evaluate the occurrence of cochlear synaptopathy.
RESULTS: Audiometric thresholds between the groups were not significantly different (p>0.05). High risk group participants showed poorer performance than the low-risk group on the TurMatrix test, in non-adaptive noise with -5 SNR and -7.5 SNR, and at the 50% understanding SNR level with headphones (p<0.01). There was no difference in the adaptive free field in noise test at which 50% understanding was achieved (p>0.05). The AP amplitudes on EcochG and wave V amplitudes on ABR were significantly smaller in the high-risk group (p<0.05). There was no association between ETDNL and I/V ratio on ABR.
CONCLUSION: Poorer performance in TurMatrix and other electrophysiologic tests revealed the negative effect of personal listening devices on the auditory system. Our findings support the hypothesis that personal listening devices could cause cochlear synaptopathy. Long-term studies are needed to determine the effects of binaural hearing and duration of noise exposure on the auditory system.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app