JOURNAL ARTICLE

Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide for remission induction in childhood polyarteritis nodosa: An open label, randomised, Bayesian, non-inferiority trial

Paul A Brogan, Barbara Arch, Helen Hickey, Jordi Anton, Este Iglesias, Eileen Baildam, Kamran Mahmood, Gavin Cleary, Elena Moraitis, Charalampia Papadopoulou, Michael W Beresford, Phil Riley, Selcan Demir, Seza Ozen, Giovanna Culeddu, Dyfrig A Hughes, Pavla Dolezalova, Lisa V Hampson, John Whitehead, David Jayne, Nicola Ruperto, Catrin Tudur-Smith, Despina Eleftheriou
Arthritis & Rheumatology 2021 March 24
33760371

OBJECTIVE: Cyclophosphamide (CYC) is used in clinical practice off-label for induction of remission of childhood polyarteritis nodosa (cPAN). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might offer a less toxic alternative: we explored their relative effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial (RCT).

METHODS: International, open-label, Bayesian, RCT investigating the relative effectiveness of MMF and CYC for remission induction in cPAN. Eleven newly-diagnosed patients were randomised (1:1) to MMF or intravenous-CYC; all received the same glucocorticoid regimen. The primary endpoint was remission within 6-months whilst compliant with glucocorticoid taper. Bayesian distributions for remission rates were established a priori for MMF and CYC by experienced clinicians, and updated to posterior distributions on trial completion.

RESULTS: Baseline disease activity/features were similar between groups. The primary remission endpoint occurred in 4/6 patients (67%) in the MMF group and 4/5 patients (80%) in the CYC group. Time to remission was shorter in the MMF group (median 7.4 weeks versus 17.5 weeks for CYC). No relapses occurred in either group within 18-months. Two serious infections were probably related to MMF. Physical and psychosocial quality-of-life scores were superior in the MMF group compared to CYC at 6-and 18-months. Combining the prior expert opinion with results from MYPAN provided posterior estimates of remission of 71% (90% CrI 51-83%) for MMF; and 75% (90% CrI 57-86%) for CYC.

CONCLUSION: Taking the prior opinion and the study results together, rates of remission induction in cPAN on MMF and CYC are similar, and MMF might be associated with better health-related quality of life than CYC.

Full Text Links

We have located links that may give you full text access.

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Responses

Sort by: Most RecentHighest Rated

Christoph Haller

NW ohne Unterschiede.

0

Christoph Haller

AM: Franz Dogma: nicht schwere Formen nur PDN Mono. Sonst meist CYC. Non inferiority Studie. Spezielle Methodologies Bayesian (D. H. sich vorher einigen, wie Therapeutika wohl wirken werden, Berechnung hat dann Einfluss auf das Study Design, man kann dann mit wenigen Fall zahlen arbeiten) .
Paul Bogen, London aus der Vaskulitis Szene.
PAN, neue ED. EP Remission nach 6 Monaten. Pädiatrischer BVAS.

Ergebnis: N=11 (über 5 Jahre).
6 MMF, 5 CYC bekommen.

Non inferiority (von MMF) is "likely".

MMF scheint nicht Minderwertig (im Vgl zu CYC).

Sekundäre Descriptive Endpunkte.
MMF etwas teurer.

0

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
33760371
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"