We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Significance of a Circulating Tumor Cell-Based Classifier in Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter, Cohort Study.
Annals of Surgery 2021 Februrary 24
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a circulating tumor cell (CTC)-based classifier in stratifying stage IB lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Stage IB LUADs have an approximately 70% 5-year survival rate. The clinical application of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is controversial due to inconsistent results in a series of trials and few useful guide biomarkers. Thus, there is a pressing need for robust biomarkers to stratify stage IB patients to define which group would most likely benefit from ACT.
METHODS: 212 stage IB LUAD patients were enrolled and were divided into three independent cohorts. The aptamer-modified NanoVelcro system was used to enrich the CTCs.
RESULTS: A cutoff of < 4 or ≥ 4 CTCs as the optimal prognostic threshold for stage IB LUAD was generated to stratify the patients in a 70-patient cohort into low-risk and high-risk groups. Patients with ≥ 4 CTCs in the training cohort had shorter progression-free survival (PFS, P < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS, P < 0.0001) than patients with < 4 CTCs. CTC number remained the strongest predictor of PFS and OS even in a multivariate analysis including other clinicopathological parameters. Furthermore, a nomogram based on the CTC count was developed to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival in the training cohort and performed well in the other two validation cohorts (C-index: 0.862, 0.853 and 0.877).
CONCLUSION: The presence of ≥ 4 CTCs can define a high-risk subgroup, providing a new strategy to make optimal clinical decisions for stage IB LUAD.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Stage IB LUADs have an approximately 70% 5-year survival rate. The clinical application of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is controversial due to inconsistent results in a series of trials and few useful guide biomarkers. Thus, there is a pressing need for robust biomarkers to stratify stage IB patients to define which group would most likely benefit from ACT.
METHODS: 212 stage IB LUAD patients were enrolled and were divided into three independent cohorts. The aptamer-modified NanoVelcro system was used to enrich the CTCs.
RESULTS: A cutoff of < 4 or ≥ 4 CTCs as the optimal prognostic threshold for stage IB LUAD was generated to stratify the patients in a 70-patient cohort into low-risk and high-risk groups. Patients with ≥ 4 CTCs in the training cohort had shorter progression-free survival (PFS, P < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS, P < 0.0001) than patients with < 4 CTCs. CTC number remained the strongest predictor of PFS and OS even in a multivariate analysis including other clinicopathological parameters. Furthermore, a nomogram based on the CTC count was developed to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival in the training cohort and performed well in the other two validation cohorts (C-index: 0.862, 0.853 and 0.877).
CONCLUSION: The presence of ≥ 4 CTCs can define a high-risk subgroup, providing a new strategy to make optimal clinical decisions for stage IB LUAD.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app