We have located links that may give you full text access.
A relook at the reliability of Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries.
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2021 Februrary 12
BACKGROUND: Controversies for treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries in particular type III injuries may be partially attributed to the lack of standardized method of radiography and measurement technique. Previous studies looking at the Rockwood classification showed poor inter-observer and intra-observer reliability (Kappa value approximately 0.20 - 0.50). We hypothesized that the use of unilateral instead of bilateral acromioclavicular joints radiographs was the cause of this. In this paper, we standardized the methodology to perform the radiograph and to measure the coracoclavicular distances. We designed the study to focus on the reliability of differentiating Type III and Type V injuries.
METHODS: A standardized radiographic protocol for bilateral Zanca view was established in our institution. All patients who performed this radiograph over a three-year period were reviewed. Radiographs of 55 patients with significant (Type III or V) injury met the inclusion criteria. For the inter-observer reliability, a retrospective radiographic review were performed by six Orthopedic surgeons and graded as either Type III or Type V. For the intra-observer reliability, the similar process were repeated by three observers after a period of six weeks.
RESULTS: Going by the majority agreement of the six reviewers, there were 34 Type III injuries and 19 Type V injuries. The Fleiss' kappa for the inter-observer reliability was calculated to be 0.624. The Cohen's kappa for the intra-observer reliability was calculated to be 0.696.
DISCUSSION: The use of standardized radiographic protocol - taking bilateral Zanca views on the same radiographic plate - would help eliminate a significant amount of variability and improve the reliability of classifying acromioclavicular joint injuries using the Rockwood classification which uses a relative measure to the contralateral site as its definition criteria. Other possible sources of poor reliability may include the masking of injuries by muscle spasm resulting in a misdiagnosis of a high grade injury as a lower grade one and the possible need to subclassify Type III injuries.
CONCLUSION: The Rockwood classification reliability can be improved through the use of standardized radiographic protocol to improve detection of vertical instability. Similar to Rockwood dividing up Tossy Grade 3 injuries when he noted the differential outcome and intervention, Rockwood Type III injuries would likely require further subclassification as it remains an anomalous beast of a high variability. Further studies are required to understand the pathological basis of transition of type III into type V injuries.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study; Validation of Classification System.
METHODS: A standardized radiographic protocol for bilateral Zanca view was established in our institution. All patients who performed this radiograph over a three-year period were reviewed. Radiographs of 55 patients with significant (Type III or V) injury met the inclusion criteria. For the inter-observer reliability, a retrospective radiographic review were performed by six Orthopedic surgeons and graded as either Type III or Type V. For the intra-observer reliability, the similar process were repeated by three observers after a period of six weeks.
RESULTS: Going by the majority agreement of the six reviewers, there were 34 Type III injuries and 19 Type V injuries. The Fleiss' kappa for the inter-observer reliability was calculated to be 0.624. The Cohen's kappa for the intra-observer reliability was calculated to be 0.696.
DISCUSSION: The use of standardized radiographic protocol - taking bilateral Zanca views on the same radiographic plate - would help eliminate a significant amount of variability and improve the reliability of classifying acromioclavicular joint injuries using the Rockwood classification which uses a relative measure to the contralateral site as its definition criteria. Other possible sources of poor reliability may include the masking of injuries by muscle spasm resulting in a misdiagnosis of a high grade injury as a lower grade one and the possible need to subclassify Type III injuries.
CONCLUSION: The Rockwood classification reliability can be improved through the use of standardized radiographic protocol to improve detection of vertical instability. Similar to Rockwood dividing up Tossy Grade 3 injuries when he noted the differential outcome and intervention, Rockwood Type III injuries would likely require further subclassification as it remains an anomalous beast of a high variability. Further studies are required to understand the pathological basis of transition of type III into type V injuries.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science Study; Validation of Classification System.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app