We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association between gallstones and the risk of biliary tract cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Epidemiology and Health 2021 Februrary 4
Objectives: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare but highly fatal. Although the etiology of BTC is poorly understood, gallstones are proposed to be an imperative risk factor. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the associations between gallstone characteristics and the risk of BTC.
Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases and systematically reviewed cohort and case-control studies published before April 9, 2018. All the included studies reported appropriate risk estimates and their confidence intervals (CIs) on the association between the presence, size, number, or duration of gallstones and the risk of BTC, including gallbladder cancer (GBC), extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC), and ampulla of Vater cancer (AOVC). Summary odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted to inspect the source of potential heterogeneity, and Egger's test was performed to assess publication bias.
Results: A total of seven cohort studies and 23 case-control studies in the Asian, European, and American populations were included. The presence of gallstones was associated with an increased risk of BTC (OR=4.38; 95% CI=3.23-5.93; I2 =91.2%), GBC (OR=7.26; 95% CI=4.33-12.18), EBDC (OR=3.17; 95% CI=2.24-4.50), and AOVC (OR=3.28; 95% CI=1.33-8.11). Gallstone size (>1 cm vs. <1 cm; OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.10-3.22) was significantly associated with the risk of GBC.
Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that gallstone characteristics, such as presence, size, and number, are associated with an increased risk of BTC. However, the study has limitations that significantly high heterogeneities were present in the meta-analyses.
Methods: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases and systematically reviewed cohort and case-control studies published before April 9, 2018. All the included studies reported appropriate risk estimates and their confidence intervals (CIs) on the association between the presence, size, number, or duration of gallstones and the risk of BTC, including gallbladder cancer (GBC), extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC), and ampulla of Vater cancer (AOVC). Summary odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted to inspect the source of potential heterogeneity, and Egger's test was performed to assess publication bias.
Results: A total of seven cohort studies and 23 case-control studies in the Asian, European, and American populations were included. The presence of gallstones was associated with an increased risk of BTC (OR=4.38; 95% CI=3.23-5.93; I2 =91.2%), GBC (OR=7.26; 95% CI=4.33-12.18), EBDC (OR=3.17; 95% CI=2.24-4.50), and AOVC (OR=3.28; 95% CI=1.33-8.11). Gallstone size (>1 cm vs. <1 cm; OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.10-3.22) was significantly associated with the risk of GBC.
Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that gallstone characteristics, such as presence, size, and number, are associated with an increased risk of BTC. However, the study has limitations that significantly high heterogeneities were present in the meta-analyses.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app