We have located links that may give you full text access.
The value of simulation in learning clinical reasoning.
La Tunisie Médicale 2020 June
BACKGROUND: Simulation allows learning in action, reflection and feedback. All these factors suggest the positive contribution of the simulation to the development of clinical reasoning. The main assessment tool for standardized testing of this skill is the script matching test.
AIM: To assess the impact of teaching through high-fidelity clinical simulation on the clinical reasoning of third-year medical students, while assessing their teaching practices, satisfaction and confidence in the learning they received during this session.
METHODS: We conducted an evaluative bicentric prospective study that included third-year medical students completing their cardiology internship during the first semester of the academic year 2019-2020 in the cardiology departments of Habib Thameur Hospital and Charles Nicolle Hospital, respectively.
RESULTS: The study included 48 students. The students who participated in this study liked the teaching practices used in the simulation-assisted lessons. Their interest in these practices is validated by the average of 37,2±5,53 obtained for active learning, 8,04±1,85 for collaboration, 8,5±1,51 for diversity of styles and 8,02±1,72 for high expectations. In our study, the results showed that students were satisfied with the learning they had made during the simulation session. The average for the measurement of satisfaction by the 48 externals was 22,37±2,54. The results of our study indicated that students were confident that their learning would allow them to solve problems similar to those presented in the simulation in a real clinical setting. This is supported by the 31,48±4,63 average student confidence in their learning. Our study showed a progression of the students' clinical reasoning with simulation using a Script Concordance Test. The mark obtained by the students after the simulation session is significantly higher than the one obtained by the students before the simulation session with p=0.008.
CONCLUSION: Simulation is an innovative pedagogical strategy and a contribution to optimizing the clinical reasoning process and improving the quality of care.
AIM: To assess the impact of teaching through high-fidelity clinical simulation on the clinical reasoning of third-year medical students, while assessing their teaching practices, satisfaction and confidence in the learning they received during this session.
METHODS: We conducted an evaluative bicentric prospective study that included third-year medical students completing their cardiology internship during the first semester of the academic year 2019-2020 in the cardiology departments of Habib Thameur Hospital and Charles Nicolle Hospital, respectively.
RESULTS: The study included 48 students. The students who participated in this study liked the teaching practices used in the simulation-assisted lessons. Their interest in these practices is validated by the average of 37,2±5,53 obtained for active learning, 8,04±1,85 for collaboration, 8,5±1,51 for diversity of styles and 8,02±1,72 for high expectations. In our study, the results showed that students were satisfied with the learning they had made during the simulation session. The average for the measurement of satisfaction by the 48 externals was 22,37±2,54. The results of our study indicated that students were confident that their learning would allow them to solve problems similar to those presented in the simulation in a real clinical setting. This is supported by the 31,48±4,63 average student confidence in their learning. Our study showed a progression of the students' clinical reasoning with simulation using a Script Concordance Test. The mark obtained by the students after the simulation session is significantly higher than the one obtained by the students before the simulation session with p=0.008.
CONCLUSION: Simulation is an innovative pedagogical strategy and a contribution to optimizing the clinical reasoning process and improving the quality of care.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app