We have located links that may give you full text access.
Long-term results of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated with minimal invasive surgery using percutaneous screw fixation.
Injury 2021 April
INTRODUCTION: Over the last 20 years, minimally invasive surgery using Percutaneous Screw Fixation (PSF) has been performed increasingly frequently in the treatment of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures (DIACFs). The purposes of this study were to assess the long-term postoperative outcomes of mobility, foot function, stability, pain and patient satisfaction.
METHODS: All patients had DIACFs and underwent PSF between 1998 and 2006 according to the method reported by Forgon and Zadravecz. Functional outcomes, range of motion and change in footwear were evaluated with the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the Maryland Foot Score (MFS). All patients completed a general health status form (Short Form-36 [SF-36]) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction. Anatomical restoration was assessed based on the pre- and postoperative radiographic images.
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with an DIACF were observed in the period 1998-2006. Patients who had open fractures, died or were <18 years of age at trauma were excluded. A total of 46 patients were asked to complete the questionnaires, during the last quarter of 2018. Of these patients, 27 with 29 DIACFs responded (58%). Nineteen were males, and the mean age at trauma was 45 years. Seven cases were classified as Sanders type II, 14 as Sanders type III, and 8 as Sanders type IV. The mean pre- and postoperative Böhler angles were 10 ͦ and 26 ͦ, respectively. The average follow-up period was 16 years, and at the follow-up, the mean AOFAS, MFS, SF-36 and VAS scores were 76, 74, 63 and 7.7 points, respectively. In comparison to the results at 5-10 years postoperatively in a previous study, we observed a decline in the average AOFAS and MFS scores by 8 and 11 points, respectively. Patient satisfaction decreased by 0.1 points and general health by 14 points.
CONCLUSION: The long-term results of this study show relatively good functional outcomes is two-thirds of the treated patients. According to the reported scores, patients described their level of function as essentially normal. PSF should therefore be considered as a good option in patients with DIAC fractures, especially in patients with Sanders II and III fractures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.
METHODS: All patients had DIACFs and underwent PSF between 1998 and 2006 according to the method reported by Forgon and Zadravecz. Functional outcomes, range of motion and change in footwear were evaluated with the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the Maryland Foot Score (MFS). All patients completed a general health status form (Short Form-36 [SF-36]) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction. Anatomical restoration was assessed based on the pre- and postoperative radiographic images.
RESULTS: Sixty-six patients with an DIACF were observed in the period 1998-2006. Patients who had open fractures, died or were <18 years of age at trauma were excluded. A total of 46 patients were asked to complete the questionnaires, during the last quarter of 2018. Of these patients, 27 with 29 DIACFs responded (58%). Nineteen were males, and the mean age at trauma was 45 years. Seven cases were classified as Sanders type II, 14 as Sanders type III, and 8 as Sanders type IV. The mean pre- and postoperative Böhler angles were 10 ͦ and 26 ͦ, respectively. The average follow-up period was 16 years, and at the follow-up, the mean AOFAS, MFS, SF-36 and VAS scores were 76, 74, 63 and 7.7 points, respectively. In comparison to the results at 5-10 years postoperatively in a previous study, we observed a decline in the average AOFAS and MFS scores by 8 and 11 points, respectively. Patient satisfaction decreased by 0.1 points and general health by 14 points.
CONCLUSION: The long-term results of this study show relatively good functional outcomes is two-thirds of the treated patients. According to the reported scores, patients described their level of function as essentially normal. PSF should therefore be considered as a good option in patients with DIAC fractures, especially in patients with Sanders II and III fractures.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app