We have located links that may give you full text access.
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Demographics and 30-day Outcomes in Adults.
American Surgeon 2021 August
BACKGROUND: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a pathology most often affecting the pediatric population, although adults can also be affected. Few studies exist of adults undergoing repair of this defect. Using a national database, we sought to determine demographics and outcomes of this population.
METHODS: An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database (2015-2018) was performed, capturing patients with postoperative diagnosis of CDH, distinct from ventral hernia. Two groups were created based upon surgical approach of open or minimally invasive (MIS) repair. Baseline demographics and outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: 110 patients undergoing surgical correction of CDH were captured in the database. We found rates of return to the operating room (4.55%), postoperative respiratory failure (5.45%), and reintubation (3.64%) with no difference between groups. There was no mortality and no difference between groups in length of operation, discharge to home, or postoperative complications. Patients undergoing open repair had a longer length of stay than patients in the MIS group (6.47 ± 10.76 days vs. 3.68 ± 3.74 days, P = .0471). Mesh was used in MIS more often than the open group (47.30% vs. 5.56%, P < .0001).
DISCUSSION: This study describes rates of postoperative complications in patients undergoing repair of CDH, and suggests outcomes those are equivalent between patients receiving open or MIS approaches. Further case series or retrospective studies are needed to further describe this population of patients.
METHODS: An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database (2015-2018) was performed, capturing patients with postoperative diagnosis of CDH, distinct from ventral hernia. Two groups were created based upon surgical approach of open or minimally invasive (MIS) repair. Baseline demographics and outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: 110 patients undergoing surgical correction of CDH were captured in the database. We found rates of return to the operating room (4.55%), postoperative respiratory failure (5.45%), and reintubation (3.64%) with no difference between groups. There was no mortality and no difference between groups in length of operation, discharge to home, or postoperative complications. Patients undergoing open repair had a longer length of stay than patients in the MIS group (6.47 ± 10.76 days vs. 3.68 ± 3.74 days, P = .0471). Mesh was used in MIS more often than the open group (47.30% vs. 5.56%, P < .0001).
DISCUSSION: This study describes rates of postoperative complications in patients undergoing repair of CDH, and suggests outcomes those are equivalent between patients receiving open or MIS approaches. Further case series or retrospective studies are needed to further describe this population of patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app