We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparison of Autofluorescence With Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Between Primary and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism.
Laryngoscope 2020 December 12
OBJECTIVES: To examine the role of autofluorescence (AF) monitoring with near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIFI) in identifying parathyroid lesions in primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism (P-HPT or S-HPT) surgeries.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study.
METHODS: Twelve lesions each were resected from 12 and 3 patients with P-HPT and S-HPT, respectively. The mean and maximum AF intensities of the lesions normalized to that of the thyroid tissue for in situ and ex vivo preparations were compared between P-HPT and S-HPT. Subjective visual classifications of AF intensity were compared with postoperative quantitative assessments. The unevenness of AF distribution inside the lesions was assessed by determining the ratio of maximum to mean AF intensity and comparing them with the corresponding ratio for normal parathyroid glands (PGs).
RESULTS: In all quantitative comparisons (in situ/ex vivo, mean, and maximum AF), AF intensities of P-HPT were stronger than those of S-PHT. The AF-positive rate in in situ subjective visual classification was higher for P-HPT (100% vs. 33%). Subjective visual classifications showed a positive correlation with AF intensities. The ratio of maximum to mean AF was higher in P-HPT and S-HPT than in normal PGs.
CONCLUSIONS: For P-HPT, AF intensity in both in situ and ex vivo preparations was sufficiently high and correlated with the subjective visual classification, suggesting that NIFI may be useful for confirming P-HPT lesions. In contrast, NIFI may have only a minor role in S-HPT surgeries owing to the weak-AF of S-HPT lesions. HPT lesions show an uneven AF intensity distribution compared with normal PGs.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2020.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study.
METHODS: Twelve lesions each were resected from 12 and 3 patients with P-HPT and S-HPT, respectively. The mean and maximum AF intensities of the lesions normalized to that of the thyroid tissue for in situ and ex vivo preparations were compared between P-HPT and S-HPT. Subjective visual classifications of AF intensity were compared with postoperative quantitative assessments. The unevenness of AF distribution inside the lesions was assessed by determining the ratio of maximum to mean AF intensity and comparing them with the corresponding ratio for normal parathyroid glands (PGs).
RESULTS: In all quantitative comparisons (in situ/ex vivo, mean, and maximum AF), AF intensities of P-HPT were stronger than those of S-PHT. The AF-positive rate in in situ subjective visual classification was higher for P-HPT (100% vs. 33%). Subjective visual classifications showed a positive correlation with AF intensities. The ratio of maximum to mean AF was higher in P-HPT and S-HPT than in normal PGs.
CONCLUSIONS: For P-HPT, AF intensity in both in situ and ex vivo preparations was sufficiently high and correlated with the subjective visual classification, suggesting that NIFI may be useful for confirming P-HPT lesions. In contrast, NIFI may have only a minor role in S-HPT surgeries owing to the weak-AF of S-HPT lesions. HPT lesions show an uneven AF intensity distribution compared with normal PGs.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2020.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app