We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Comparison of PET imaging of activated fibroblasts and 18 F-FDG for diagnosis of primary hepatic tumours: a prospective pilot study.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the performance of 68 Ga-labelled fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET and 18 F-FDG PET for imaging of hepatic tumours.
METHODS: We prospectively assessed 20 patients with suspected intrahepatic lesions. Tumour radiological features, pathology, or follow-up examinations were assessed as ground truth in correlation with PET scans. Semiquantitative analysis was additionally performed by measuring the standardised uptake value (SUV). Tumour-to-liver background ratios (TBR) were calculated and compared between 68 Ga-FAPI PET and 18 F-FDG PET. FAPI expression was assessed by immunochemistry in samples obtained from 7 patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC)/intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or granulomas.
RESULTS: Primary intrahepatic tumours, including 16 HCC in 14 patients and 4 ICC in 3 patients with extrahepatic metastases, were determined by histology (n = 14) and clinical examinations (n = 3). Based on visual analysis, 17 patients presented elevated 68 Ga-FAPI uptake (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 100%), while 7 patients presented 18 F-FDG avid tumours (sensitivity: 58.8%, specificity: 100%). 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT identified 17 extrahepatic metastases vs. 13 in 18 F-FDG PET/CT in 2 ICC patients. Three benign liver nodules in three patients showed negligible uptake in dual-PET scans. The SUVmax_HCC = 8.47 ± 4.06 and TBRmax_HCC = 7.13 ± 5.52, and SUVmax_ICC = 14.14 ± 2.20 TBRmax_ICC = 26.46 ± 4.94 in 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT were significantly higher than the 18 F-FDG uptake presenting SUVmax_HCC = 4.86 ± 3.58 and TBRmax_HCC = 2.39 ± 2.21, and SUVmax_ICC = 9.19 ± 3.60 and TBRmax_ICC = 2.39 ± 2.21 (all p values < 0.05). ICC patients showed higher levels of FAPI uptake in the primary hepatic lesions compared to extrahepatic metastases, TBRmax_ICC = 15.18 ± 5.80 (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: 68 Ga-FAPI PET-CT has superior potential in the detection of primary hepatic malignancy compared to 18 F-FDG.
METHODS: We prospectively assessed 20 patients with suspected intrahepatic lesions. Tumour radiological features, pathology, or follow-up examinations were assessed as ground truth in correlation with PET scans. Semiquantitative analysis was additionally performed by measuring the standardised uptake value (SUV). Tumour-to-liver background ratios (TBR) were calculated and compared between 68 Ga-FAPI PET and 18 F-FDG PET. FAPI expression was assessed by immunochemistry in samples obtained from 7 patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC)/intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or granulomas.
RESULTS: Primary intrahepatic tumours, including 16 HCC in 14 patients and 4 ICC in 3 patients with extrahepatic metastases, were determined by histology (n = 14) and clinical examinations (n = 3). Based on visual analysis, 17 patients presented elevated 68 Ga-FAPI uptake (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 100%), while 7 patients presented 18 F-FDG avid tumours (sensitivity: 58.8%, specificity: 100%). 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT identified 17 extrahepatic metastases vs. 13 in 18 F-FDG PET/CT in 2 ICC patients. Three benign liver nodules in three patients showed negligible uptake in dual-PET scans. The SUVmax_HCC = 8.47 ± 4.06 and TBRmax_HCC = 7.13 ± 5.52, and SUVmax_ICC = 14.14 ± 2.20 TBRmax_ICC = 26.46 ± 4.94 in 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT were significantly higher than the 18 F-FDG uptake presenting SUVmax_HCC = 4.86 ± 3.58 and TBRmax_HCC = 2.39 ± 2.21, and SUVmax_ICC = 9.19 ± 3.60 and TBRmax_ICC = 2.39 ± 2.21 (all p values < 0.05). ICC patients showed higher levels of FAPI uptake in the primary hepatic lesions compared to extrahepatic metastases, TBRmax_ICC = 15.18 ± 5.80 (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: 68 Ga-FAPI PET-CT has superior potential in the detection of primary hepatic malignancy compared to 18 F-FDG.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app