We have located links that may give you full text access.
Reliability of Postoperative Radiographies in Ankle Fractures.
Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020 September
Background: The accuracy of reduction of ankle fractures using postoperative plain radiographies (x-ray) remains widely controversial. Some authors have demonstrated that postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan can be useful for these patients. In current study, the efficacy of x-rays after fixation of ankle fractures was investigated based on the CT scan findings.
Methods: A total of 73 patients with ankle fractures who were subjected to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were enrolled. After surgery, if the reduction was acceptable based on the x-rays according to standard measurements, the patient was referred for CT scanning. Forty four patients were included in the study. Undesirable CT scan findings including malreduction of fragments or articular surfaces, device malpositioning, missed fractures, and undetected intra-articular fragments were documented.
Results: Undesirable CT findings were seen in 25 patients (56.8%). CT scan showed acceptable reduction without device malpositioning in 19 patients. The most prevalent findings in CT images were malreduction and device malpositioning in 17 and 16 patients, respectively. There was no abnormal finding in CT imaging of lateral malleolar fractures. In two thirds of the injured syndesmosis, device malpositioning, and malreduction were detected in CT scan.
Conclusion: Despite acceptable postoperative x-rays, a considerable number of patients with ankle fractures had inappropriate reduction or undesirable findings in their postoperative CT scan. It seems necessary to use CT scan after ORIF of ankle fractures in order to examine the accuracy of reduction. Further validation of postoperative CT scan in ankle fracture surgery should be investigated.
Methods: A total of 73 patients with ankle fractures who were subjected to open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) were enrolled. After surgery, if the reduction was acceptable based on the x-rays according to standard measurements, the patient was referred for CT scanning. Forty four patients were included in the study. Undesirable CT scan findings including malreduction of fragments or articular surfaces, device malpositioning, missed fractures, and undetected intra-articular fragments were documented.
Results: Undesirable CT findings were seen in 25 patients (56.8%). CT scan showed acceptable reduction without device malpositioning in 19 patients. The most prevalent findings in CT images were malreduction and device malpositioning in 17 and 16 patients, respectively. There was no abnormal finding in CT imaging of lateral malleolar fractures. In two thirds of the injured syndesmosis, device malpositioning, and malreduction were detected in CT scan.
Conclusion: Despite acceptable postoperative x-rays, a considerable number of patients with ankle fractures had inappropriate reduction or undesirable findings in their postoperative CT scan. It seems necessary to use CT scan after ORIF of ankle fractures in order to examine the accuracy of reduction. Further validation of postoperative CT scan in ankle fracture surgery should be investigated.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app