Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Use of the MyProstateScore (MPS) Test to Rule Out Clinically-Significant Cancer: Validation of a Straightforward Clinical Testing Approach.

Journal of Urology 2020 October 21
PURPOSE: The MyProstateScore (MPS) test was validated for improved detection of clinically-significant (Grade Group [GG] ≥2) prostate cancer relative to PSA-based risk calculators. We sought to validate an optimal MPS threshold for clinical use in ruling-out GG ≥2 cancer in men referred for biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsy-naïve men provided post-digital rectal examination (DRE) urine prior to biopsy. MPS was calculated using the validated, locked multivariable model including only serum PSA, urinary PCA3, and urinary TMPRSS2:ERG. The MPS threshold approximating 95% sensitivity for GG ≥2 cancer was identified in a training cohort, and performance was measured in two external validation cohorts. We assessed the (i) overall biopsy-referral population and (ii) population meeting guideline-based testing criteria (ie, PSA 3-10; or PSA <3 with suspicious DRE).

RESULTS: Validation cohorts were prospectively-enrolled from academic (n=977, median PSA 4.5 [IQR:3.1-6.0]) and community (n=548, median PSA 4.9 [IQR:3.7-6.8]) settings. In the overall validation population (n=1525), 338 men (22%) had GG ≥2 cancer on biopsy. The MPS threshold of 10 provided 97% sensitivity and 98% negative predictive value (NPV) for GG ≥2 cancer. MPS testing would have prevented 387 unnecessary biopsies (33%), while missing only ten GG ≥2 cancers (3.0%). In 1242 patients meeting guideline-based criteria, MPS ≤10 provided 96% sensitivity, 97% NPV, and would have prevented 32% of unnecessary biopsies, missing 3.7% of GG ≥2 cancers.

CONCLUSIONS: In a large, clinically-pertinent biopsy-referral population, MPS ≤10 provided exceptional sensitivity and NPV for ruling-out GG ≥2 cancer. This straightforward secondary testing approach would reduce the use of more costly and invasive procedures after screening with PSA.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app