We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of gear type on Vibrio spp. levels in farm-raised oysters (Crassostrea virginica) after routine handling and resubmersion.
Journal of Food Protection 2020 October 10
During routine handling, cultured oysters are removed from the water and exposed to elevated temperatures, causing growth of Vibrio vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus within. Farmers can resubmerse oysters in the water, allowing elevated Vibrio spp. levels to return to ambient levels within the oysters. Previous resubmersion research is limited to one aquaculture gear type during studies performed from June-September. This study aims to expand existing knowledge on the recovery times needed for elevated Vibrio levels in handled oysters from two common gear types (adjustable longline system [ALS] and OysterGro system [OG]) during early and mid-summer periods. Oysters held in both gear types were subjected to being tumbled and refrigerated (TR) or desiccated, then resubmersed into water in May and July of 2018 and 2019. Vibrio spp. levels were measured before (pre) and after (post) the treatments, and 3, 7, and 14 days after resubmersion, and compared to levels in submersed oysters. All samples were tested for V. vulnificus, total V. parahaemolyticus, and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus (tdh+/trh+). Water temperatures in May were significantly lower (~5ºC; p ≤ 0.009) than in July, corresponding to lower V. vulnificus levels (-0.67 log MPN/g) and higher tdh+/trh+ levels (+0.56-0.63 log MPN/g) in control oysters. The average Vibrio spp. levels in control oysters from each trial did not differ between the gear types (p ≥ 0.08). Elevated V. vulnificus levels recovered to ambient levels after seven days in May and three days in July, regardless of gear or handling. For V. parahaemolyticus, the desiccated oysters required 14 days to recover in May, and 7 days in July, while the TR oysters required 14 days or more in both months. This study had limited replication in each month, but the data suggest that the resubmersion times differ between the gear types, treatment types and months. Future studies with more replication are needed to determine if these trends continue.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app