We have located links that may give you full text access.
Macroscopic and microscopic analysis of the mechanical properties and adhesion force of cells using a single cell tensile test and atomic force microscopy: Remarkable differences in cell types.
Many experimental techniques have been reported to provide knowledge of the mechanical behavior of cells from biomechanical viewpoints, however, it is unclear how the intercellular structural differences influence macroscopic and microscopic mechanical properties of cells. The aim of our study is to clarify the comprehensive mechanical properties and cell-substrate adhesion strength of cells, and the correlation with intracellular structure in different cell types. We developed an originally designed micro tensile tester, and performed a single cell tensile test to estimate whole cell tensile stiffness and adhesion strength of normal vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and cervical cancer HeLa cells: one half side of the specimen cell was lifted up by a glass microneedle, then stretched until the cell detached from the substrate, while force was simultaneously measured. The tensile stiffness and adhesion strength were 49 ± 10 nN/% and 870 ± 430 nN, respectively, in VSMCs (mean ± SD, n = 8), and 19 ± 17 nN/% and 320 ± 160 nN, respectively, in HeLa cells (n = 9). The difference was more definite in the surface elastic modulus map obtained by atomic force microscopy, indicating that the internal tension of the actin cytoskeleton was significantly higher in VSMCs than in HeLa cells. Structural analysis with confocal microscopy revealed that VSMCs had a significant alignment of F-actin cytoskeleton with mature focal adhesion, contrary to the randomly oriented F-actin with smaller focal adhesion of HeLa cells, indicating that structural arrangement of the actin cytoskeleton and their mechanical tension generated the differences in cell mechanical properties and adhesion forces. The finding strongly suggests that the mechanical and structural differences in each cell type are deeply involved with their physiological functions.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app