Risk Factors for Acute Choroidal Ischemia after Intra-arterial Melphalan for Retinoblastoma: The Role of the Catheterization Approach.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for acute choroidal ischemia (ACI) after intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty patients (248 eyes) treated with IAC in Lausanne between November 2008 and September 2019 (665 procedures). All patients were evaluated on a monthly basis with fundus photography and fluorescein angiography before and after each IAC injection.

METHODS: Acute choroidal ischemia, defined as any new choroidal ischemia clinically diagnosed within 35 days after an IAC injection, were noted. Eyes with choroidal complications diagnosed later than 35 days after the last IAC injection (n = 7) or those for which the status of the choroid was not assessable (n = 35) were excluded. Specific procedure parameters and treatment regimens were compared between the group of eyes with and without ACI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Procedure-related risk factors for ACI after IAC injection and visual acuity assessment in the group of eyes with ACI.

RESULTS: Acute choroidal ischemia developed in 35 of 206 included eyes after a mean of 2 injections. No differences were found between the two study groups regarding age at first IAC injection, disease grouping at diagnosis, previously administered treatments, number of IAC injections, drug dose, mean injection time, injection method (pulsatile vs. continuous), or concomitant intravitreal melphalan use. Treatment regimen (melphalan vs. combined melphalan plus topotecan; P < 0.05), catheterization route (internal carotid artery vs. external carotid or posterior communicating artery; P < 0.001), and catheterization type (occlusive into the ophthalmic artery [OA] vs. nonocclusive; P < 0.001) were included in multivariate analysis, and occlusive catheterization was identified as an independent risk factor for ACI (P < 0.001). In the subgroup undergoing an occlusive procedure, placement of the catheter tip into the OA distal third versus medial and proximal thirds (P = 0.04) and a mean catheter diameter-to-OA lumen ratio of 0.6 or more (P < 0.001) were correlated significantly with ACI. Complete vision loss was noted in 27% of the eyes with ACI that were old enough for visual assessment (n = 9/33), whereas 33% maintained a useful vision ranging between 0.1 and 0.8 (n = 11/33).

CONCLUSIONS: Catheterization of the OA should be attempted from an ostial position or an external carotid approach to minimize the risk of potentially vision-threatening choroidal complications.