We have located links that may give you full text access.
Abdominal wall incisional hernia repair improves respiratory function: results after 3 years of follow-up.
Hernia : the Journal of Hernias and Abdominal Wall Surgery 2020 September 15
PURPOSE: Hernias severely impact patient quality of life (QoL), and 80% of patients require a surgical operation. Moreover, hernias are responsible for respiratory function alterations. This study aims to investigate the postoperative alterations in respiratory function after open ventral hernia repair in patients with incisional hernia.
METHODS: Patients operated on at the Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" at Palermo University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 were identified in a prospective database. Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The respiratory outcome measures used were forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, peak expiratory flow (PEF) and PEF percentage (%PEF). The timepoints at which the parameters listed were assessed were t0 , 1 week before the surgical operation; t1 , 12 months later; and t2 , 3 years later.
RESULTS: The difference between mean preoperative and postoperative PEF was significant [t0 4.32 (4.03-7.92), t1 6.7 (4.27-8.24) with p = 0.012 and t2 6.5 (4.25-8.21) with p = 0.026]. The %PEF increased from 75% preoperatively to 87% at t1 (p = 0.009) and to 85% at t2 (p = 0.03). No differences were found in the comparison of pre- and postoperative FVC, FEV1 or FEV1/FVC ratio.
CONCLUSION: The improvement in respiratory measures suggests the importance of abdominal wall restoration to recover functional activity of respiratory function.
METHODS: Patients operated on at the Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" at Palermo University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2016 were identified in a prospective database. Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The respiratory outcome measures used were forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, peak expiratory flow (PEF) and PEF percentage (%PEF). The timepoints at which the parameters listed were assessed were t0 , 1 week before the surgical operation; t1 , 12 months later; and t2 , 3 years later.
RESULTS: The difference between mean preoperative and postoperative PEF was significant [t0 4.32 (4.03-7.92), t1 6.7 (4.27-8.24) with p = 0.012 and t2 6.5 (4.25-8.21) with p = 0.026]. The %PEF increased from 75% preoperatively to 87% at t1 (p = 0.009) and to 85% at t2 (p = 0.03). No differences were found in the comparison of pre- and postoperative FVC, FEV1 or FEV1/FVC ratio.
CONCLUSION: The improvement in respiratory measures suggests the importance of abdominal wall restoration to recover functional activity of respiratory function.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app