JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Testing for IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase in routine clinical practice: Requesting behaviour in relation to prevalence of positive results.

Objective: Due to the high awareness of coeliac disease and improvement of serological tests, the number of requested laboratory tests has increased substantially over the years. In the current study we have evaluated the requesting behaviour of distinct clinical disciplines in relation to the prevalence of positive results and in the context of existing guidelines.

Methods: Data were retrospectively extracted from the laboratory information system over a time-span of 5 years in a tertiary hospital and compared with the situation in a secondary hospital.

Results: Data reveal that for initial testing (n=18,183) the percentage positive results for IgA anti-TTG is <2%. Paediatricians have a slightly higher percentage of seropositive results (2.4-4.0%). Early confirmation (<2 months) of positive results by IgA anti-endomysium antibodies in an independent sample is only performed in a minority of paediatric patients. The majority of positive patients, however, have follow-up measurements (<14 months) in order to examine compliance to a gluten-free diet. Interestingly, initial requests for paediatric patients reveal an equal distribution between boys and girls, while in adult patients there is a two times preponderance of requests in female patients, similar to the female/male ratio in patients with positive results, being either paediatric or adult patients.

Conclusion: Although laboratory testing for coeliac disease may be primarily used to exclude the disease, it is evident that the percentage positive results for IgA anti-TTG is extremely low. This may indicate that the clinical manifestations that warrant testing, should be further specified in order to increase the pre-test probability. As the specific serology is important to bypass a biopsy in the diagnosis of coeliac disease according to the paediatric guideline, the confirmation in an independent sample needs to get more attention.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app