We have located links that may give you full text access.
High inter- and intra-observer agreement in mapping sequences compared to classical Lake Louise Criteria assessment of myocarditis by inexperienced observers.
Clinical Radiology 2020 July 20
AIM: To investigate the observer agreement for the assessment of chronic myocarditis by native T1 and T2 relaxation times, post-contrast T1 relaxation time, and extracellular volume (ECV) fraction, compared to Lake Louise Criteria: oedema ratio (OR) and early gadolinium enhancement ratio (EGEr).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on 71 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as part of a complete diagnostic work-up according to current guidelines for suspected myocarditis. Thirteen cases were excluded due to previous myocardial infarction or technical issues. To test for intra- and interobserver agreement, the determination of the myocardial native T1 and T2 relaxation times, post-contrast T1 relaxation time, ECV, OR and EGEr was undertaken by two medical school graduates after comprehensive training. Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were assessed.
RESULTS: The final analysis included 27 patients with chronic myocarditis, 21 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and/or hypertensive heart disease, and 10 patients with unremarkable investigations in the control group. Excellent interobserver agreement was obtained for native T1 and T2 relaxation times, post-contrast T1 relaxation time and ECV, with ICC of 0.982/0.977/0.991/0.994, p < 0.001. Interobserver agreement was lower for OR and EGEr, with ICC of 0.841 and 0.818, p < 0.001, respectively. Mapping parameters (cut-off values: T1 1,070 ms, T2 54 ms, ECV 30%) yield good performance in the diagnosis of chronic myocarditis with the best sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 93%/80%/88% for ECV, followed by 70%/80%/74% for T2, and 52%/88%/69% for T1.
CONCLUSIONS: mapping parameters show excellent agreement between observers in the assessment of myocarditis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on 71 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as part of a complete diagnostic work-up according to current guidelines for suspected myocarditis. Thirteen cases were excluded due to previous myocardial infarction or technical issues. To test for intra- and interobserver agreement, the determination of the myocardial native T1 and T2 relaxation times, post-contrast T1 relaxation time, ECV, OR and EGEr was undertaken by two medical school graduates after comprehensive training. Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were assessed.
RESULTS: The final analysis included 27 patients with chronic myocarditis, 21 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and/or hypertensive heart disease, and 10 patients with unremarkable investigations in the control group. Excellent interobserver agreement was obtained for native T1 and T2 relaxation times, post-contrast T1 relaxation time and ECV, with ICC of 0.982/0.977/0.991/0.994, p < 0.001. Interobserver agreement was lower for OR and EGEr, with ICC of 0.841 and 0.818, p < 0.001, respectively. Mapping parameters (cut-off values: T1 1,070 ms, T2 54 ms, ECV 30%) yield good performance in the diagnosis of chronic myocarditis with the best sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 93%/80%/88% for ECV, followed by 70%/80%/74% for T2, and 52%/88%/69% for T1.
CONCLUSIONS: mapping parameters show excellent agreement between observers in the assessment of myocarditis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app