JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW

Relative Proximity of Critical Power and Metabolic/Ventilatory Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Miguel Ángel Galán-Rioja, Fernando González-Mohíno, David C Poole, José Mª González-Ravé
Sports Medicine 2020 July 1
32613479

BACKGROUND: Critical power (CP) has been redefined as the new 'gold standard' that represents the boundary between the heavy- and severe-exercise intensity domains and hence the maximal metabolic steady state (MMSS). However, several other "thresholds", for instance, the maximal lactate steady state [MLSS], ventilatory thresholds [VT1 , VT2 ] and respiratory compensation point [RCP]) have been considered synonymous with CP.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the scientific literature and perform a meta-analysis to determine the degree of correspondence/difference between CP and MLSS, VT1 , VT2 and RCP.

METHODS: A literature search on 2 databases (Scopus and Web of Science) was conducted on October 2, 2019. After analyzing 356 resultant articles, studies were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: (a) studies were randomized controlled trials, (b) studies included interrelations between CP and VT1 , VT2 , MLSS, RCP. Articles were excluded if they constituted duplicate articles or did not meet the inclusion criteria. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. This resulted in 104 participants. A random effects weighted meta-analysis with correlation coefficients was used to pool the results.

RESULTS: The pooled correlation coefficient of CP and all thresholds analyzed was r = 0.73 (p > 0.00001). The subgroup analysis for each threshold with CP demonstrated significant correlation coefficients of r = 0.80 (95% CI [0.40; 1.21], Z = 3.90, p = 0.0001) for CP & RCP; r = 0.77 (CI 95% = [0.36; 1.18], Z = 3.71, p = 0.0002) for CP & MLSS; r = 0.76 (CI 95% = [0.31; 1.21], Z = 3.32, p = 0.0009) for CP & VT1 . However, CP & VT2 , r = 0.39 (CI 95% = [- 0.37; 1.15], Z = 1.01, p = 0.31) were not significantly correlated. Despite the significant correlations between CP and VT1 , MLSS and RCP these variables and VT2 under- (VT1 , 30%; MLSS, 11%) or over-estimated (RCP, 6%; VT2 , 21%) CP.

CONCLUSION: Regardless of the presence of significant correlations among CP and ventilatory or metabolic thresholds CP differs significantly from each. Thus, logically, if CP represents the best estimate of the heavy-severe exercise intensity transition none of the thresholds considered (i.e., VT1 , VT2 , MLSS, RCP), at least as determined in the studies analyzed herein, should be considered synonymous with such.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
32613479
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"