OPEN IN READ APP
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A comparison of 4-year total medical care costs, adverse outcomes, and opioid/prescription analgesic use for 3 knee osteoarthritis pain treatments: Intra-articular hyaluronic acid, intra-articular corticosteroids, and knee arthroplasty

John Mackowiak, John T Jones, Vinod Dasa
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism 2020 January 17
32088013

OBJECTIVES: To compare the medical costs associated with treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA): intra-articular corticosteroids (ICS) and intra-articular hyaluronic acid (IHA) primarily, and ICS/IHA vs knee arthroplasty (TKA) secondarily.

METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of an insurance claims database. Eligible members had diagnosed OA and no claims for ICS, IHA, or TKA during the 6-18-month look-back period. Cohorts of interest over the 4-year observation period were: patients who received ICS only, those who received IHA only, and those who received TKA only. Outcomes assessed included: (1) total allowed medical costs, (2) claims for pre-specified, treatment-related adverse outcomes and costs, and (3) opioid and/or prescription analgesic use and costs. Data extraction began on the date of the first ICS, IHA, or TKA in 2013 until December 31, 2017.

RESULTS: Of the 260,828 patients who qualified, 126,831 were taking monotherapy (IHA=3703, ICS=117,588, TKA = 5540). Adjusted 4-year per patient per month (PPPM) costs were lowest in the IHA cohort ($733); PPPM costs were $1230 in the ICS cohort and $1548 in the TKA cohort. A smaller percentage of patients in the IHA (7.1%) vs ICS (8.4%) or TKA cohort (11.8%) experienced any of the pre-specified adverse outcomes. Adverse outcome-related costs in the IHA cohort were lower ($19.91) than costs in the ICS ($32.18) and TKA cohorts ($31.12). Per-patient opioid and analgesic prescriptions were consistently and significantly lower in the IHA (range, 0.70-0.96) vs ICS cohort (range, 2.0-2.26) for Years 1 through 4. Usage rates were significantly lower in the IHA cohort vs TKA cohort in Year 1 (0.96 vs 4.77) and not different in Years 2 through 4 (TKA range, 0.76-1.08). In Year 1, opioid and prescription analgesic costs were significantly lower in the IHA vs ICS and TKA cohorts ($3.45 vs $11.14 and $12.82). After Year 1, opioid and prescription analgesic costs were significantly higher in the ICS (range, $13.83-15.96) vs IHA (range, $3.02-3.87) and TKA cohorts (range, $3.43-4.97).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the IHA cohort had lower total medical care costs, fewer adverse outcomes, and lower use/costs of opioids and prescription analgesics vs patients in the ICS and TKA cohorts. Reducing total medical care costs and minimizing opioid/analgesic use should be a treatment goal when selecting therapies for patients with knee OA.

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
32088013
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"