We have located links that may give you full text access.
CT and MRI for the diagnosis of perilymphatic fistula: a study of 17 surgically confirmed patients.
European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology 2020 April
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the usefulness of CT and MRI for the diagnosis of perilymphatic fistula (PLF) of the round (RW) and/or oval (OW) windows, with surgery as gold standard.
METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 17 patients who presented a surgically confirmed PLF of the round (RW) or oval (OW) windows. All patients were imaged by CT + MRI (T2W SSFP without contrast) prior to surgery (= gold standard). Two radiologists, analyzed the RW and OW on the side of the clinical symptoms and sensitivity (Se) + Specificity (Sp) were calculated.
RESULTS: Round window fistula was the most frequent (71%). The best sign of PLF on imaging was a fluid filling of the window niches, which had good Se (83-100% for RW, 66-83% for OW) and Sp (60% for RW, 91-100% for OW). Disorientation of the footplate and pneumolabyrinth were also only observed in 50% of OW PLF.
CONCLUSION: The combination of CT and MRI is a reliable tool for a fast and accurate diagnosis of round and oval window perilymphatic fistula, with good sensitivity (> 80%). The most common sign of PLF on imaging is the presence of a fluid-filling in the RW (especially if > 2/3 of the RW niche) or in the OW niches on both CT and MRI. A disorientation of the footplate or the presence of a pneumolabyrinth are clearly in favor of an oval window perilymphatic fistula.
METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 17 patients who presented a surgically confirmed PLF of the round (RW) or oval (OW) windows. All patients were imaged by CT + MRI (T2W SSFP without contrast) prior to surgery (= gold standard). Two radiologists, analyzed the RW and OW on the side of the clinical symptoms and sensitivity (Se) + Specificity (Sp) were calculated.
RESULTS: Round window fistula was the most frequent (71%). The best sign of PLF on imaging was a fluid filling of the window niches, which had good Se (83-100% for RW, 66-83% for OW) and Sp (60% for RW, 91-100% for OW). Disorientation of the footplate and pneumolabyrinth were also only observed in 50% of OW PLF.
CONCLUSION: The combination of CT and MRI is a reliable tool for a fast and accurate diagnosis of round and oval window perilymphatic fistula, with good sensitivity (> 80%). The most common sign of PLF on imaging is the presence of a fluid-filling in the RW (especially if > 2/3 of the RW niche) or in the OW niches on both CT and MRI. A disorientation of the footplate or the presence of a pneumolabyrinth are clearly in favor of an oval window perilymphatic fistula.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app