We have located links that may give you full text access.
EXTRA-PERITONEAL PACKING IN UNSTABLE BLUNT PELVIC TRAUMA: A SINGLE-CENTER STUDY.
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 2020 Februrary 7
BACKGROUND: Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures often require a multi-modal approach including both operative and endovascular management. While an important adjunct in hemorrhage control, time to angioembolization (AE) even at the most advanced trauma centers may take hours. Extra-Peritoneal Packing (EPP) is a fast and effective procedure that can immediately address pelvic hemorrhage from the retroperitoneal space in severe pelvic injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of early EPP, looking at 24 hour and overall mortality, and the hemodynamic impact of EPP in unstable blunt pelvic trauma.
METHODS: All trauma patients admitted to an urban Level I trauma center were evaluated from 2002 to 2018 in a retrospective single-center comparative study. Inclusion criteria were patients >= 14 years old who sustained blunt trauma with pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability. Exclusion criteria were a concomitant head injury (AIS >3) and patients who underwent resuscitative thoracotomy. The patient population was divided into two groups: an EPP group and a No-EPP group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics in the two groups: a one-to-one matched analysis using nearest-neighbor matching was performed based on the estimated propensity score of each patient.
RESULTS: Two-hundred forty four patients presented hemodynamically unstable, with a pelvic fracture (180 No-EPP, 64 EPP). With propensity score matching, thirty-seven patients in each group were analyzed. Survival within the first 24 hours was significantly improved in the EPP group (81.1% vs. 59.5%, p=0.042) and we registered similar results in overall survival rate (78.4% EPP group vs 56.8% No-EPP group, p=0.047). Those patients who underwent early EPP (n=64) were associated with a significant improvement in hemodynamic stability, with a pre-EPP mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 49.9 mmHg and post-EPP MAP of 70.1 mmHg (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: EPP is an effective procedure that can be performed immediately, even within the trauma bay, to improve hemodynamic stability and overall survival in patients who sustain severe blunt pelvic trauma. The early use of EPP can be lifesaving.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LOE III.
METHODS: All trauma patients admitted to an urban Level I trauma center were evaluated from 2002 to 2018 in a retrospective single-center comparative study. Inclusion criteria were patients >= 14 years old who sustained blunt trauma with pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability. Exclusion criteria were a concomitant head injury (AIS >3) and patients who underwent resuscitative thoracotomy. The patient population was divided into two groups: an EPP group and a No-EPP group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics in the two groups: a one-to-one matched analysis using nearest-neighbor matching was performed based on the estimated propensity score of each patient.
RESULTS: Two-hundred forty four patients presented hemodynamically unstable, with a pelvic fracture (180 No-EPP, 64 EPP). With propensity score matching, thirty-seven patients in each group were analyzed. Survival within the first 24 hours was significantly improved in the EPP group (81.1% vs. 59.5%, p=0.042) and we registered similar results in overall survival rate (78.4% EPP group vs 56.8% No-EPP group, p=0.047). Those patients who underwent early EPP (n=64) were associated with a significant improvement in hemodynamic stability, with a pre-EPP mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 49.9 mmHg and post-EPP MAP of 70.1 mmHg (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: EPP is an effective procedure that can be performed immediately, even within the trauma bay, to improve hemodynamic stability and overall survival in patients who sustain severe blunt pelvic trauma. The early use of EPP can be lifesaving.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LOE III.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app