We have located links that may give you full text access.
Donor Site Morbidity in Phalloplasty Reconstructions: Outcomes of the Radial Forearm Free Flap.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open 2019 September
The radial artery forearm free flap (RFFF) is the workhorse technique for phallus reconstruction. The RFFF provides good cosmesis and potential sensory recovery. However, the donor site is large in comparison to other applications of the RFFF which may increase the potential for donor site morbidity, such as nerve injury, delayed wound healing, and decreased hand strength. This study systematically reviewed the current literature to assess the donor site morbidity associated with RFFF phalloplasty (RFFFP).
Methods: A systematic review utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines was completed of the current literature pertaining to donor site morbidity after RFFFP. Two investigators independently reviewed the literature to determine eligibility for inclusion. Two hundred sixty-seven studies were reviewed and 10 were included in the final analysis after application of exclusion criteria.
Results: Nine hundred forty flap reconstructions were identified. Gender affirming surgery was the indication in 77.7% (n = 730) of patients. The overall donor site complication rate was 7.9% (n = 74). Skin graft failure occurred in 41 patients (4.5%) and was the most frequent complication. Donor site infection (n = 3, 15.8%), hematoma (n = 1, 0.8%), neuroma (n = 1, 10%), compartment syndrome (n = 1, 0.8%), decreased strength or sensation (n = 15, 4.9%), lymphedema or limb swelling (n = 10, 3.9%), and contracture (n = 2, 6.5%) were also found.
Conclusions: The most common donor site complication after RFFFP is skin graft failure. Decreased forearm sensation and strength affected a significant proportion of patients within each reported cohort. Prospective studies should continue to evaluate donor site morbidity with objective measures, such as grip strength evaluation, and long-term follow-up for vascular changes following radial artery harvest.
Methods: A systematic review utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines was completed of the current literature pertaining to donor site morbidity after RFFFP. Two investigators independently reviewed the literature to determine eligibility for inclusion. Two hundred sixty-seven studies were reviewed and 10 were included in the final analysis after application of exclusion criteria.
Results: Nine hundred forty flap reconstructions were identified. Gender affirming surgery was the indication in 77.7% (n = 730) of patients. The overall donor site complication rate was 7.9% (n = 74). Skin graft failure occurred in 41 patients (4.5%) and was the most frequent complication. Donor site infection (n = 3, 15.8%), hematoma (n = 1, 0.8%), neuroma (n = 1, 10%), compartment syndrome (n = 1, 0.8%), decreased strength or sensation (n = 15, 4.9%), lymphedema or limb swelling (n = 10, 3.9%), and contracture (n = 2, 6.5%) were also found.
Conclusions: The most common donor site complication after RFFFP is skin graft failure. Decreased forearm sensation and strength affected a significant proportion of patients within each reported cohort. Prospective studies should continue to evaluate donor site morbidity with objective measures, such as grip strength evaluation, and long-term follow-up for vascular changes following radial artery harvest.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app