We have located links that may give you full text access.
A new tool for comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a pilot study from China.
Chinese Medical Journal 2020 January 14
BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common type of hematological malignancy in elderly people. Geriatricians have developed comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) methods for elderly patients; however, the tools used for CGA in AML are not uniform. Thus, we aimed to validate the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales, age, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index), and albumin (IACA) index, which is a new tool for CGA, in elderly patients with AML.
METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years who had been diagnosed with AML were screened for eligibility. Among the IACA low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using χ and Fisher exact tests. In addition, probabilities of overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A total of 21, 34, and 6 patients were categorized into IACA low-risk (0 point), intermediate-risk (1-2 points), and high-risk (≥3 points) groups, respectively. The rates of relapse/progression-related mortality were 23.8%, 58.8%, and 100.0% in the IACA low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (χ = 12.81, P < 0.001). The 2-year probabilities of OS were 47.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.8%-72.6%) and 20.2% (95% CI 5.9%-34.5%) in the IACA low- and intermediate-risk groups, respectively (χ = 5.99, P = 0.014), which were significantly higher than those in the high-risk group (low-risk [47.7% (95% CI 22.8%-72.6%)] vs. high-risk [0], χ = 20.80, P < 0.001; intermediate-risk [20.2% (95% CI 5.9%-34.5%)] vs. high-risk [0], χ = 7.56, P = 0.006; respectively). In the IACA low-risk group, the 2-year probability of OS in patients receiving induction chemotherapy (50.8% [95% CI 24.1%-77.5%]) was significantly higher than that in those receiving best supportive care (0, χ = 25.74, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: We suggest that the IACA index might be a simple and effective tool for comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly AML patients.
METHODS: Patients aged ≥60 years who had been diagnosed with AML were screened for eligibility. Among the IACA low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using χ and Fisher exact tests. In addition, probabilities of overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A total of 21, 34, and 6 patients were categorized into IACA low-risk (0 point), intermediate-risk (1-2 points), and high-risk (≥3 points) groups, respectively. The rates of relapse/progression-related mortality were 23.8%, 58.8%, and 100.0% in the IACA low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (χ = 12.81, P < 0.001). The 2-year probabilities of OS were 47.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.8%-72.6%) and 20.2% (95% CI 5.9%-34.5%) in the IACA low- and intermediate-risk groups, respectively (χ = 5.99, P = 0.014), which were significantly higher than those in the high-risk group (low-risk [47.7% (95% CI 22.8%-72.6%)] vs. high-risk [0], χ = 20.80, P < 0.001; intermediate-risk [20.2% (95% CI 5.9%-34.5%)] vs. high-risk [0], χ = 7.56, P = 0.006; respectively). In the IACA low-risk group, the 2-year probability of OS in patients receiving induction chemotherapy (50.8% [95% CI 24.1%-77.5%]) was significantly higher than that in those receiving best supportive care (0, χ = 25.74, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: We suggest that the IACA index might be a simple and effective tool for comprehensive geriatric assessment in elderly AML patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app