We have located links that may give you full text access.
Dental educators' attitudes toward the teaching of dental amalgam.
European Journal of Dental Education : Official Journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe 2020 January 11
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain dental educators' attitudes toward the teaching of dental amalgam at dental schools in Australia, and identify preferred curricular approaches in a potentially 'amalgamless' profession.
METHODS: A mixed methods analysis was employed based on an open-ended response survey followed by a closed-ended questionnaire. Identification of key issues from the survey helped frame the questionnaire. Participants included those with expertise in operative and restorative dentistry, with direct involvement in curriculum development or delivery, at Australian dental schools.
RESULTS: Participants numbered fifteen and represented seven of the nine dental schools in Australia. Key themes identified and explored included: (in)consistency of approach to teaching restorative dentistry; a perceived disconnect between undergraduate study and the 'real world'; a need for a focus on teaching of alternatives to dental amalgam (80 per cent (strongly) agreeing); the contradictory nature of the evidence-base and literature that is not readily understood; the need for more postgraduate education relating to adhesive restorative materials (86 per cent (strongly) agreeing); the need for dental amalgam to continue to be available; formal understandings (guidelines) as to the use of dental amalgam; dental schools in Australia being heard on these issues; and the relevance of this issue (100 per cent (strongly) agreeing the issue is topical and important).
CONCLUSION: There is a broad consensus of dental educators at Australian dental schools as how best to approach the teaching of amalgam if a phase-down is to occur and the issues any such approach may face.
METHODS: A mixed methods analysis was employed based on an open-ended response survey followed by a closed-ended questionnaire. Identification of key issues from the survey helped frame the questionnaire. Participants included those with expertise in operative and restorative dentistry, with direct involvement in curriculum development or delivery, at Australian dental schools.
RESULTS: Participants numbered fifteen and represented seven of the nine dental schools in Australia. Key themes identified and explored included: (in)consistency of approach to teaching restorative dentistry; a perceived disconnect between undergraduate study and the 'real world'; a need for a focus on teaching of alternatives to dental amalgam (80 per cent (strongly) agreeing); the contradictory nature of the evidence-base and literature that is not readily understood; the need for more postgraduate education relating to adhesive restorative materials (86 per cent (strongly) agreeing); the need for dental amalgam to continue to be available; formal understandings (guidelines) as to the use of dental amalgam; dental schools in Australia being heard on these issues; and the relevance of this issue (100 per cent (strongly) agreeing the issue is topical and important).
CONCLUSION: There is a broad consensus of dental educators at Australian dental schools as how best to approach the teaching of amalgam if a phase-down is to occur and the issues any such approach may face.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app