We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of an endoscopic bite block on one-handed mask ventilation.
Journal of Anesthesia 2020 January 9
PURPOSE: An endoscopic bite block is a device to ensure that the patient's mouth remains wide open during endoscopic procedures. Wide opening of the mouth may facilitate the efficiency of one-handed mask ventilation. We evaluated the effect of an endoscopic bite block on mask ventilation among three ventilation techniques: one-handed ventilation, one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block, and two-handed ventilation.
METHODS: Fifty-nine anesthetized and paralyzed patients were included. After induction of anesthesia, one-handed ventilation, one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block and two-handed ventilation were performed in a cross-over, randomized order. The primary outcome was the expiratory tidal volume (mL/kg of predicted body weight). Secondary outcomes included minute ventilation (L/min) and the incidence of inadequate mask ventilation or dead space ventilation.
RESULTS: The expiratory tidal volume of one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block was significantly improved when compared with that of one-handed ventilation (8.2 [6.8-10.2] mL/kg vs. 7.1 [4.5-9.0] mL/kg, respectively, difference = 1.1 mL/kg; 95% CI 0.8-2.4; P < 0.001), and was comparable to that of two-handed ventilation (8.9 [6.3-11.5] mL/kg; difference = 0.7 mL/kg; 95% CI - 0.7 to 1.5; P = 0.432). Minute ventilation was also significantly improved in one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block compared with that in one-handed ventilation (7.4 [6.3-8.6] L/min vs. 6.7 [4.2-7.9] L/min, respectively, difference = 0.7 L/min; 95% CI 0.6-2.0; P < 0.001), and was comparable to that of two-handed ventilation (7.7 [6.5-9.5] L/min; difference = 0.3 L/min; 95% CI - 0.5 to 1.4; P = 0.390). The incidence of inadequate ventilation or dead space ventilation was not different among the ventilation techniques (P = 0.080).
CONCLUSION: The use of an endoscopic bite block improved one-handed mask ventilation, showing comparable efficacy with two-handed mask ventilation.
METHODS: Fifty-nine anesthetized and paralyzed patients were included. After induction of anesthesia, one-handed ventilation, one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block and two-handed ventilation were performed in a cross-over, randomized order. The primary outcome was the expiratory tidal volume (mL/kg of predicted body weight). Secondary outcomes included minute ventilation (L/min) and the incidence of inadequate mask ventilation or dead space ventilation.
RESULTS: The expiratory tidal volume of one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block was significantly improved when compared with that of one-handed ventilation (8.2 [6.8-10.2] mL/kg vs. 7.1 [4.5-9.0] mL/kg, respectively, difference = 1.1 mL/kg; 95% CI 0.8-2.4; P < 0.001), and was comparable to that of two-handed ventilation (8.9 [6.3-11.5] mL/kg; difference = 0.7 mL/kg; 95% CI - 0.7 to 1.5; P = 0.432). Minute ventilation was also significantly improved in one-handed ventilation with an endoscopic bite block compared with that in one-handed ventilation (7.4 [6.3-8.6] L/min vs. 6.7 [4.2-7.9] L/min, respectively, difference = 0.7 L/min; 95% CI 0.6-2.0; P < 0.001), and was comparable to that of two-handed ventilation (7.7 [6.5-9.5] L/min; difference = 0.3 L/min; 95% CI - 0.5 to 1.4; P = 0.390). The incidence of inadequate ventilation or dead space ventilation was not different among the ventilation techniques (P = 0.080).
CONCLUSION: The use of an endoscopic bite block improved one-handed mask ventilation, showing comparable efficacy with two-handed mask ventilation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app