Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prospective observational investigation of body habitus measurements and relationship to epidural depth in term pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: High body mass index (BMI) can predict difficult neuraxial block; however, fat distribution may also be important. The primary study aim was to identify body habitus and fat distribution measurements that correlated with ultrasound measured epidural depth. We hypothesized that measurements such as midarm and subscapular fatpad thicknesses and length of cervical spine may correlate better with ultrasound measured epidural depth than a global measure of BMI.

METHODS: Prospective IRB approved study of term pregnant women requiring neuraxial block. We measured height, weight (BMI, kg/m2 ), subscapular, midarm fatpad thickness (digital caliper, mm), vertebral column length (C7 to sacral hiatus, cm) and epidural depth (ultrasound, mm). Four experts assessed photographs to assign anticipated difficult neuraxial block in sitting and lateral positions (5-point Likert scale, 1 = very easy, 5 = very difficult).

RESULTS: In all, 131 women completed body habitus measurements. Measured mean (standard deviation) BMI was 30.3 (5.4) kg/m2 . Measured BMI, subscapular fatpad and midarm fatpad thickness were significantly correlated with ultrasound depth to epidural space (R2 0.733, 0.626 and 0.633, respectively, P < .0001) but vertebral column length was not. The experts had a high level of agreement (Cronbach's alpha >0.7) for assessment of anticipated difficult block in the sitting and lateral positions; however, anticipated difficult block was not correlated with epidural depth measured by ultrasound for sitting position, R2  = -0.015, P = .87; and lateral position, R2  = -0.087, P = .33.

CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of body habitus and fat distribution were no better than measured BMI to anticipate greater ultrasound measured depth to epidural space. Clinical trial number: Non-interventional observational study, not registered.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app