Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of dose distributions between transverse magnetic fields of 0.35 T and 1.5 T for radiotherapy in lung tumor using Monte Carlo calculation.

We investigated the impact of the transverse magnetic fields of 0.35 T and 1.5 T on the dose distributions for a 6 MV beam, by using a thorax phantom with a lung tumor. First, the dose distributions in the magnetic flux densities of 0 T, 0.35 T, and 1.5 T were compared by increasing the number of irradiation fields. Next, the dose distributions for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with 5-fields for an isolated lung tumor was compared in transverse magnetic fields. All dose distributions were calculated by the Monte Carlo method. The prescription doses for SBRT with 5-fields was 48 Gy for D95 (dose covering 95% volume) in the planning target volume (PTV). The dose distributions were analyzed by the dose difference map (DD map), dose volume histogram (DVH), and dose indices. For the 1-field, the dose distributions were more affected at 1.5 T rather than 0.35 T. The DVHs for PTV at 1.5 T almost agreed with those at 0 T for more than 5-fields. In contrast, the D98 in the PTV at 0.35 T reduced constantly by 6.0% with more than 5-fields. The D95 in PTV for SBRT with 5-fields was 9.0% lower at 0.35 T and 2.5% higher at 1.5 T, in comparison with that at 0 T. For dispersed irradiation angles of more than 5-fields, it is more desirable to use the magnetic flux density of 1.5 T than 0.35 T for the radiotherapy in the lung tumor.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app