Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Ex vivo comparison of the effect of storage temperature on canine intestinal leakage pressures.

Veterinary Surgery 2019 November 14
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of storage temperature on cadaveric small intestinal leakage pressures after enterotomy.

STUDY DESIGN: Experimental ex vivo study.

ANIMALS: Grossly normal jejunal segments from four canine cadavers.

METHODS: Thirty-six jejunal segments (n = 12 segments/group) were harvested immediately after euthanasia and assigned to a fresh group (tested within 4 hours), chilled group (stored for 24 hours at 4°C before testing), or freeze-thaw group (frozen at -20°C for 7 days and thawed at 21°C for 6 hours before testing). A 2-cm antimesenteric enterotomy was performed and repaired with 4-0 monofilament suture in a simple-continuous pattern. Initial leakage pressure (ILP), maximal intraluminal pressure (MIP), and leakage location were recorded, with testing performed at room temperature.

RESULTS: Mean ± SD ILP for fresh, chilled, and frozen-thawed specimens was 52.9 ± 8.4, 51.8 ± 11.9 and 29.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg, respectively. There was a difference in ILP among groups (P < .003), with freeze-thaw samples demonstrating lower ILP compared with other groups. There was no difference in MIP between groups (P = .186) There was a difference in leakage location among groups (P = .004), with the majority of chilled and freeze-thaw samples leaking at the suture holes compared with the incisional line in fresh samples.

CONCLUSION: Freezing and subsequent thawing prior to specimen testing reduced ILP compared with use of fresh and chilled specimens but did not affect MIP among experimental groups.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Cadaveric canine intestinal specimens tested immediately after collection or after chilling for 24 hours should be recommended for ex vivo burst pressure assessment in dogs. Additional studies to evaluate loss in testing viability of chilled intestinal specimens are warranted to help govern experimental methodologies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app